Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] extend git-describe pattern matching

2 messages, 2 authors, 2017-01-18 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] extend git-describe pattern matching

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2017-01-18 20:18:56

Jacob Keller [off-list ref] writes:
From: Jacob Keller <redacted>

** v3 fixes a minor typo in one of the test cases, so please ignore v2
   I left the interdiff as between v1 and v3 instead of v2 **
Very much appreciated.

I just finished reading this round through and didn't have any major
issues.  I sent comments on the way the feature is explained to the
end users and history readers, though.

Thanks.

Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] extend git-describe pattern matching

From: Jacob Keller <hidden>
Date: 2017-01-18 21:06:56

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Jacob Keller [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
From: Jacob Keller <redacted>

** v3 fixes a minor typo in one of the test cases, so please ignore v2
   I left the interdiff as between v1 and v3 instead of v2 **
Very much appreciated.

I just finished reading this round through and didn't have any major
issues.  I sent comments on the way the feature is explained to the
end users and history readers, though.

Thanks.
Ok. I am currently taking a look at the exclude_list that was
mentioned, and I will see if it makes sense to go that route. If we
do, it would open up a way to make the git-describe logic similar to
git-log (which is probably good), and if we want to do this, it's best
to do it now before we add any additional arguments (ie: before we
create a conflicting user interface).

Thanks,
Jake
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help