Johannes Sixt [off-list ref] writes:
Am 16.12.2016 um 19:08 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
quoted
Sorry for not having waited for you to chime in before agreeing to
fast-track this one, and now this is in 'master'.
No reason to be sorry, things happen... Dscho's request for
fast-tracking was very reasonable, and the patch looked "obviously
correct".
Oh, I do agree it was reasonable and looked obviously correct. And
I suspect that it did not make anything worse, either, so there is
not much harm done, other than that I now have to remember not to
merge it down without further fixes to 'maint' and declare the NUL
thing fixed ;-)
Unfortunately, I'm away from my Windows box over the weekend. It will
have to wait until Monday before I can test this idea.
Thanks.
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Sixt [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Am 16.12.2016 um 19:08 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
quoted
Sorry for not having waited for you to chime in before agreeing to
fast-track this one, and now this is in 'master'.
No reason to be sorry, things happen... Dscho's request for
fast-tracking was very reasonable, and the patch looked "obviously
correct".
Oh, I do agree it was reasonable and looked obviously correct. And
I suspect that it did not make anything worse, either, so there is
not much harm done, other than that I now have to remember not to
merge it down without further fixes to 'maint' and declare the NUL
thing fixed ;-)
Actually, due to having way too many worktrees I managed to test the exact
wrong build product and failed to notice that the patch I asked to
fast-track broke paging in Git for Windows' Git Bash, too, not only in
CMD.
Bummer.
quoted
Unfortunately, I'm away from my Windows box over the weekend. It will
have to wait until Monday before I can test this idea.
Thanks.
I just sent out a fixer-upper patch series, hopefully I got it right this
time.
Hannes, it would be very nice if you could beat on it for a bit.
Happy holidays,
Dscho