Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
I forgot, we ended up reversing course later and silencing them:
http://public-inbox.org/git/20140505052117.GC6569@sigill.intra.peff.net/
By the rationale of that conversation, we should be doing:
warning("%s", "");
here.
I forgot too. Thanks for digging up that thread.
On 30/11/16 23:46, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
I forgot, we ended up reversing course later and silencing them:
http://public-inbox.org/git/20140505052117.GC6569@sigill.intra.peff.net/
By the rationale of that conversation, we should be doing:
warning("%s", "");
here.
I forgot too. Thanks for digging up that thread.
Yes, I blamed wt-status.c:227 and came up with commit 7d7d68022
as well.
So, by the same rationale, we should remove -Wno-format-zero-length
from DEVELOPER_CFLAGS. yes?
ATB,
Ramsay Jones
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 01:18:35AM +0000, Ramsay Jones wrote:
quoted
quoted
I forgot, we ended up reversing course later and silencing them:
http://public-inbox.org/git/20140505052117.GC6569@sigill.intra.peff.net/
By the rationale of that conversation, we should be doing:
warning("%s", "");
here.
I forgot too. Thanks for digging up that thread.
Yes, I blamed wt-status.c:227 and came up with commit 7d7d68022
as well.
So, by the same rationale, we should remove -Wno-format-zero-length
from DEVELOPER_CFLAGS. yes?
I don't have a preference on which direction we go, but yes, right now
we are in an awkward middle ground. We should do one of:
1. Drop -Wno-format-zero-length from DEVELOPER_CFLAGS and make sure
future patches to do not violate it.
2. Declare warning("") as OK.
I still think the warning is silly, but (1) has value in that it
produces the least surprise and annoyance to various people building
Git.
-Peff