Getting the "message" given a branch designation and conversely

4 messages, 4 authors, 2016-08-24 · open the first message on its own page

Getting the "message" given a branch designation and conversely

From: <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-14 14:58:25

I am learning how to use git. I would like to know how:

Given a branch's designation, such as "master~4", how can I see the message I
furnished when I created the branch using "git commit"?

Conversely, given the message I furnished to "git commit", when I created a
branch, how can I see the branch's designation?

Context:

    Operating System: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation release 6.8

    git version: 1.7.1

Thank you, very much.

    Norman Shapiro

Re: Getting the "message" given a branch designation and conversely

From: Philip Oakley <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-14 17:32:07

From: <redacted>
I am learning how to use git. I would like to know how:

Given a branch's designation, such as "master~4", how can I see the 
message I
furnished when I created the branch using "git commit"?

Conversely, given the message I furnished to "git commit", when I created 
a
branch, how can I see the branch's designation?

Context:

   Operating System: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation release 6.8

   git version: 1.7.1

Thank you, very much.

   Norman Shapiro
--
Norman,

To see the commit message try 'git log'. You will need a revision range, so 
try 'git help revisions' to set a guide about all the different ways you can 
spell that. While at it, it's worth 'git help glossary' just to understand 
some of the terminology.

--
Philip
'git log HEAD~4^!' 

Re: Getting the "message" given a branch designation and conversely

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-15 12:28:43

On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 07:58:14AM -0700, norm@dad.org wrote:
I am learning how to use git. I would like to know how:

Given a branch's designation, such as "master~4", how can I see the message I
furnished when I created the branch using "git commit"?
Somebody already pointed you at "git log", which is the right tool for
looking at commit messages (or perhaps "git show" if you only want to
see a single entry).
Conversely, given the message I furnished to "git commit", when I created a
branch, how can I see the branch's designation?
Try "git log --grep=some.regex" to find a particular commit. Usually we
refer to commits by their sha1 id, which will be shown by git-log.
However, you can use git-describe to generate a name for any commit that
is based on traversing from a tag. Try:

  git describe --contains --all <sha1>

for example. Using "--all" tells git to consider names based on branches
as well as tags. Using "--contains" will generate a name based on
traversing backwards from the tags and branches (like "master~4") rather
than basing the name on a tag that you build off of.

-Peff

Re: Getting the "message" given a branch designation and conversely

From: Jakub Narębski <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-24 14:39:35

W dniu 15.08.2016 o 14:28, Jeff King pisze:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 07:58:14AM -0700, norm@dad.org wrote:
quoted
I am learning how to use git. I would like to know how:

Given a branch's designation, such as "master~4", how can I see the message I
furnished when I created the branch using "git commit"?
Somebody already pointed you at "git log", which is the right tool for
looking at commit messages (or perhaps "git show" if you only want to
see a single entry).
I think you would want "git log -1 master~4" or "git show master~4" to
see the commit message of a single commit (without diff).
quoted
Conversely, given the message I furnished to "git commit", when I created a
branch, how can I see the branch's designation?
Try "git log --grep=some.regex" to find a particular commit. Usually we
refer to commits by their sha1 id, which will be shown by git-log.
There is also :/<search> and <rev>^{/<search>} syntax, if you want 
composability (see gitrevisions(7)).
However, you can use git-describe to generate a name for any commit that
is based on traversing from a tag. Try:

  git describe --contains --all <sha1>

for example. Using "--all" tells git to consider names based on branches
as well as tags. Using "--contains" will generate a name based on
traversing backwards from the tags and branches (like "master~4") rather
than basing the name on a tag that you build off of.
The "git describe --contains" is interface to "git name-rev" plumbing

-- 
Jakub Narębski
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help