Signed-off-by: Bert Wesarg <redacted>
---
tg.sh | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tg.sh b/tg.sh
index 4dcc15e..21294f9 100644
--- a/tg.sh
+++ b/tg.sh
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ info()
die()
{
- info "fatal: $*"
+ info "fatal: $*" >&2
exit 1
}
--
tg: (f17218e..) bw/die-to-stderr (depends on: master)
also sprach Bert Wesarg [off-list ref] [2008.11.21.1105 +0100]:
- info "fatal: $*"
+ info "fatal: $*" >&2
Shouldn't info also output to stderr?
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
"i have made good judgments in the past.
i have made good judgments in the future."
- george w. bush
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 01:36:54PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Bert Wesarg [off-list ref] [2008.11.21.1105 +0100]:
quoted
- info "fatal: $*"
+ info "fatal: $*" >&2
Shouldn't info also output to stderr?
die is calling info. So this patch is enough.
You should just send this patch to the author. I think he'll apply it
instantly. I've send a small patch to him yesterday as well.
Marc Weber
also sprach Marc Weber [off-list ref] [2008.11.21.1428 +0100]:
quoted
Shouldn't info also output to stderr?
die is calling info. So this patch is enough.
Sure, I was just wondering whether info() shouldn't also print to
stderr. Or only die(). I think info() prints status messages, which
are not standard operation and thus don't go to stdout, but go to
stderr. No?
You should just send this patch to the author. I think he'll apply
it instantly. I've send a small patch to him yesterday as well.
Yes, but I applied that. :)
(I am Petr's apprentice, learning to help him a bit with TopGit).
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
"wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muß man schweigen."
-- wittgenstein
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net