David Miller [off-list ref] writes:
Linus recommended this, otherwise any renames cause the
diffstate output to be rediculious in some circumstances :)
Thanks, but "rediculious"?
I think this makes sense, especially as it matches what we
show after a git-pull that ought to match the request.
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
David Miller [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Linus recommended this, otherwise any renames cause the
diffstate output to be rediculious in some circumstances :)
Thanks, but "rediculious"?
Kernel dewalopers can't speel. We all knew that.
At least we don't do 1337-sp33k.
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 08:45:28 -0800 (PST)
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
David Miller [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Linus recommended this, otherwise any renames cause the
diffstate output to be rediculious in some circumstances :)
Thanks, but "rediculious"?
Kernel dewalopers can't speel. We all knew that.
At least we don't do 1337-sp33k.