Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics)

3 messages, 3 authors, 2016-08-11 · open the first message on its own page

Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics)

From: Alexandre Julliard <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 20:42:07

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
* js/shallow (Fri Nov 24 16:00:13 2006 +0100)

 Probably with a better documentation of its limitations and caveats, 
 this should be mergeable to 'master'.
The more I see the missing reaction, the less sure I am this is a sensible 
thing to do.
I'm not sure what reaction you expect, but this is something a lot of
our occasional Wine users are requesting. The Wine full history is
80Mb, and that's a big download if you just want to try a quick
patch. Now of course you won't see these users around here hacking on
shallow clone, most likely they just went and downloaded Wine from the
CVS mirror instead. But it's a shame to have to maintain a CVS mirror
just for that purpose...

-- 
Alexandre Julliard

Re: shallow clones, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics)

From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 19:44:00

Johannes Schindelin wrote:
.
quoted
I'm not sure what reaction you expect, but this is something a lot of 
our occasional Wine users are requesting. The Wine full history is 80Mb, 
and that's a big download if you just want to try a quick patch. Now of 
course you won't see these users around here hacking on shallow clone, 
most likely they just went and downloaded Wine from the CVS mirror 
instead. But it's a shame to have to maintain a CVS mirror just for that 
purpose...
Sorry, I was just mumbling about the fact that I would _like_ to hear back 
about successes and failures. If there are problems I want to fix them.
quoted

How about this. This is already reported 

kvaneesh@kvaneesh-laptop:/tmp$git clone --depth 2 /home/opensource/git git.test
.....
 100% (743/743) done


kvaneesh@kvaneesh-laptop:/tmp$cd git.test/
[master@git.test]$ git fsck-objects



[master@git.test]$ git fetch --depth 4
remote: Generating pack...
remote: Done counting 872 objects.
...
 100% (1/1) done
Total 1 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
Unpacking 1 objects
 100% (1/1) done


[master@git.test]$ git fsck-objects
dangling commit aca085e577688108a2480b96a2f7077424a74e4d
dangling commit b360cca0b100e14abffa4cae78521b493c783738
dangling commit cd976f5c52694acb4b23c3f2425ed4f0a47ec799

shallow clones, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics)

From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 19:57:42

Hi,

On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
* js/shallow (Fri Nov 24 16:00:13 2006 +0100)

 Probably with a better documentation of its limitations and caveats, 
 this should be mergeable to 'master'.
The more I see the missing reaction, the less sure I am this is a sensible 
thing to do.
I'm not sure what reaction you expect, but this is something a lot of 
our occasional Wine users are requesting. The Wine full history is 80Mb, 
and that's a big download if you just want to try a quick patch. Now of 
course you won't see these users around here hacking on shallow clone, 
most likely they just went and downloaded Wine from the CVS mirror 
instead. But it's a shame to have to maintain a CVS mirror just for that 
purpose...
Sorry, I was just mumbling about the fact that I would _like_ to hear back 
about successes and failures. If there are problems I want to fix them.

So, do you actually know of people who _used_ (as opposed to "tested") 
shallow clones?

Ciao,
Dscho
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help