4 messages, 4 authors, 2016-08-11 · open the first message on its own page
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 19:53:08
Karl Hasselström [off-list ref] writes:
On 2006-10-26 09:50:48 +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:quoted
That said, git-am should understand QP with coding in mail headers.I really hope it does, since I just patched StGIT to generate such headers. (Out of pure vanity -- I don't want my name mangled!)
Sorry for an earlier hiccup.
From: Nicolas Pitre <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 20:13:19
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Jakub Narebski wrote:
Junio C Hamano wrote:quoted
Karl Hasselström [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On 2006-10-26 09:50:48 +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:quoted
That said, git-am should understand QP with coding in mail headers.I really hope it does, since I just patched StGIT to generate such headers. (Out of pure vanity -- I don't want my name mangled!)Sorry for an earlier hiccup.That said, I don't think that Nicolas Pitre wanted to have "index-pâck" in subject instead of "index-pack".
Indeed. I don't know how that â ended up there. Nicolas
From: Jakub Narebski <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 20:40:18
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Karl Hasselström [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On 2006-10-26 09:50:48 +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:quoted
That said, git-am should understand QP with coding in mail headers.I really hope it does, since I just patched StGIT to generate such headers. (Out of pure vanity -- I don't want my name mangled!)Sorry for an earlier hiccup.
That said, I don't think that Nicolas Pitre wanted to have "index-pâck" in subject instead of "index-pack". -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git
From: Karl Hasselström <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 20:47:23
On 2006-10-26 02:33:54 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Sorry for an earlier hiccup.
Without the occasional hiccup we wouldn't have any itches to scratch, and there would be no progress. :-) -- Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com