Re: [PATCH] Fix git-for-each-refs broken for tags

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-08-11 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH] Fix git-for-each-refs broken for tags

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 19:50:38

Thanks for noticing.

This is not like rev-list where we walk all over the map of
ancestry graph, so it might be a simpler and better to keep
the buffer than to keep duplicate copies of pieces.

Re: [PATCH] Fix git-for-each-refs broken for tags

From: Petr Baudis <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 19:53:31

On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 05:45:11AM CET, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Thanks for noticing.

This is not like rev-list where we walk all over the map of
ancestry graph, so it might be a simpler and better to keep
the buffer than to keep duplicate copies of pieces.
I would rather not do that in any new code since it's gonna be a problem
if you use this outside of the standalone command as part of libgit.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
The meaning of Stonehenge in Traflamadorian, when viewed from above, is:
"Replacement part being rushed with all possible speed."
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help