bash completion in backticks partially broken

From: Shawn Pearce <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 19:31:10

So an annoying feature of bash appears to be that it won't really
provide completion on backtick'd commands.

For example I can complete "git merge-base ma" just fine as is, but
if I toss it into backticks say "git update-ref M `git merge-base ma"
then I can't complete "ma" out to "master" anymore.

A little bit of debugging appears to show that bash is invoking the
completion hook for the outermost command; that is we are looking
for parameters for update-ref and not merge-base.

I think I could rewrite a good part of git-completion.bash to
support this use.  But it won't work for "echo `git merge-base ma"
as the outermost command is echo and we don't have a Git completion
hook registered for that command.

This is really annoying when it comes to less contrived examples.
I find myself forming odd pipelines with commit-tree, update-ref,
mktree, lstree, sed, rev-list, etc. and always keep bumping up on
the limitations of git-completion.bash.

Any suggestions?  How often do bash users try to use backticks to
call Git commands, only to find bash isn't being as helpful as it
should be?

-- 
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help