Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] doc: clearer rule about formatting literals
From: Matthieu Moy <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-16 02:19:45
Matthieu Moy [off-list ref] writes:
Tom Russello [off-list ref] writes:quoted
--- a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines +++ b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines@@ -526,12 +526,13 @@ Writing Documentation: modifying paragraphs or option/command explanations that contain options or commands: - Literal examples (e.g. use of command-line options, command names, and - configuration variables) are typeset in monospace, and if you can use - `backticks around word phrases`, do so. + Literal examples (e.g. use of command-line options, command names, + configuration and environment variables) must be typeset in monospace (i.e. + wrapped with backticks): `--pretty=oneline` `git rev-list` `remote.pushDefault` + `GIT_DIR`Don't you want `$GIT_DIR` here?
Actually, not really. The use (which seems rather consistant) is to say "The `GIT_...` environment variable" when referring to the variable, and to use $GIT_... when referring to its value, like in "`$GIT_DIR/hooks` directory". It makes sense since not all systems use $ (AFAIK, Windows uses %variable% where POSIX uses $variable), so it's best to use a neutral syntax when possible. OTOH, writting `GIT_DIR/hooks` without the $ would be really confusing as one could read it as the literal string `GIT_DIR`. I think this rule (when to use $ and when not to use it) deserves to be clarified here too. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/