Re: [PATCH 5/5] pathspec: record labels

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-16 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH 5/5] pathspec: record labels

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-16 02:19:25

Stefan Beller [off-list ref] writes:
"... but for now Git treats it as if it is not set at all" is a valuable
information to the user, still?
Not at all.  "What you are using is wrong and there is no guarantee
what behaviour you would get" is the message we need to convey.

Re: [PATCH 5/5] pathspec: record labels

From: Stefan Beller <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-16 02:19:25

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Stefan Beller [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
"... but for now Git treats it as if it is not set at all" is a valuable
information to the user, still?
Not at all.  "What you are using is wrong and there is no guarantee
what behaviour you would get" is the message we need to convey.
    "Path '%s': Ignoring label set to false; This may behave
differently in future versions of Git."

Maybe even with s/may/will/

I think that conveys both the message about the future as well as
"what happened just now in that command"
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help