Re: [PATCH] name-rev: include taggerdate in considering the best name

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-16 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH] name-rev: include taggerdate in considering the best name

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-16 02:18:55

Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] writes:
... I think this is still the simplest model we can use
without trying to really do a topo-sort. And in many ways it's the
simplest one to explain to people too: "we try to use the oldest
reference we can find as a base for the resulting name" is not a
complex or hard concept to explain.
Yes, the more I look at Dscho's patch, the more like it exactly for
that reason.  Its behaviour is very simple from the end-user's point
of view, unlike the historical one.

Re: [PATCH] name-rev: include taggerdate in considering the best name

From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-16 02:18:56

Hi,

[fixing Uwe's email address, as the address bounces that was recorded in
the commit introducing the flawed behavior, and I failed to check mailmap
earlier.]

On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
... I think this is still the simplest model we can use
without trying to really do a topo-sort. And in many ways it's the
simplest one to explain to people too: "we try to use the oldest
reference we can find as a base for the resulting name" is not a
complex or hard concept to explain.
Yes, the more I look at Dscho's patch, the more like it exactly for
that reason.  Its behaviour is very simple from the end-user's point
of view, unlike the historical one.
Well, seeing as I introduced the bug, it's only fair that I fix it, too.

Ciao,
Dscho
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help