Re: GSoC 2016: applications open, deadline = Fri, 19/2

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: GSoC 2016: applications open, deadline = Fri, 19/2

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:08:18

Duy Nguyen [off-list ref] writes:
Probably too late now, anyway.. with David's multiple ref backend
work, we could have a third, no-dependency backend. We can use index
format to store refs. Then we can avoid case-sensitivity issue with
filesystems.
I'd actually vote for a ref backend that is based on a tree object ;-)

    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/282677

Re: GSoC 2016: applications open, deadline = Fri, 19/2

From: Duy Nguyen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:08:18

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Duy Nguyen [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Probably too late now, anyway.. with David's multiple ref backend
work, we could have a third, no-dependency backend. We can use index
format to store refs. Then we can avoid case-sensitivity issue with
filesystems.
I'd actually vote for a ref backend that is based on a tree object ;-)

    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/282677
For reasonably small sets of refs I think index beats trees (remember
we have cache-tree, which basically gives us the tree behind the
scene), but when you have so many refs, hierarchical storage may be
more efficient. Either way it's nice to see a builtin, no dependency
backend besides "files".
-- 
Duy
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help