Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] worktree: new repo extension to manage worktree behaviors

5 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] worktree: new repo extension to manage worktree behaviors

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:08:02

Max Kirillov [off-list ref] writes:
The worktree feature has been used by several people
already (me included), and do far the only issue which
requires change in repository layout is the config
separation. Isn't it enough to be confident?
One lessor key phrase above is "so far", I think, and another one
you forgot to use is s/which requires/that we know &/, which to me
is a more serious one.  IOW, I do think it is premature for us to
say that that config split issue is the only thing, or to say that
the issue is best solved by changing the layout in the way being
discussed; the multiple-worktree feature needs more lab experience
for us to gain confidence.

Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] worktree: new repo extension to manage worktree behaviors

From: Stefan Monnier <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:08:03

One lessor key phrase above is "so far", I think, and another one
you forgot to use is s/which requires/that we know &/, which to me
is a more serious one.  IOW, I do think it is premature for us to
say that that config split issue is the only thing, or to say that
the issue is best solved by changing the layout in the way being
discussed; the multiple-worktree feature needs more lab experience
for us to gain confidence.
As a heavy user of the git-new-worktree "hack / script", is there
something I can do to help "get more experience"?


        Stefan

Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] worktree: new repo extension to manage worktree behaviors

From: Stefan Monnier <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:08:03

As a heavy user of the git-new-worktree "hack / script", is there
                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                         git-new-workdir
Sorry,


        Stefan

Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] worktree: new repo extension to manage worktree behaviors

From: Duy Nguyen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:08:03

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Stefan Monnier [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
One lessor key phrase above is "so far", I think, and another one
you forgot to use is s/which requires/that we know &/, which to me
is a more serious one.  IOW, I do think it is premature for us to
say that that config split issue is the only thing, or to say that
the issue is best solved by changing the layout in the way being
discussed; the multiple-worktree feature needs more lab experience
for us to gain confidence.
As a heavy user of the git-new-worktree "hack / script", is there
something I can do to help "get more experience"?
You can try out "git worktree" command (in "lab" environment) and see
what's missing, what use cases of yours it does not support.
-- 
Duy

git worktree (was: [PATCH v3 1/6] worktree: new repo extension to manage worktree behaviors)

From: Stefan Monnier <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:08:06

quoted
As a heavy user of the git-new-worktree "hack / script", is there
something I can do to help "get more experience"?
You can try out "git worktree" command (in "lab" environment) and see
what's missing, what use cases of yours it does not support.
Cool, didn't know about it, and it's even already in Debian testing!
Using it right now.  So far so good,


        Stefan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help