[BUG?] worktree setup broken in subdirs with git alias

6 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

[BUG?] worktree setup broken in subdirs with git alias

From: Michael J Gruber <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:07:39

Hi there,

sorry I can't dig deeper now, but the worktree code from next seems to
get confused now as soon as you cd to a subdir of a worktree (other than
the main worktree) and use an alias:

git help ss
`git ss' is aliased to `status -s -b'
[mjg@skimbleshanks Biomath-WS15 (exam $)]✓ git status -s -b
## exam
[mjg@skimbleshanks Biomath-WS15 (exam $)]✓ git ss
fatal: internal error: work tree has already been set
Current worktree: /home/mjg/Teaching/LUK
New worktree: /home/mjg/Teaching/LUK/Biomath-WS15

This is inside the subdir "Biomath-WS15" of the worktree residing in
".../LUK".

It wasn't like that last year ;)

Something about setting GIT_DIR and the like in the environment must
have changed (for aliases), badly interacting with the worktree code.

Michael

Re: [BUG?] worktree setup broken in subdirs with git alias

From: Duy Nguyen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:07:39

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Michael J Gruber
[off-list ref] wrote:
Hi there,

sorry I can't dig deeper now, but the worktree code from next seems to
get confused now as soon as you cd to a subdir of a worktree (other than
the main worktree) and use an alias:

git help ss
`git ss' is aliased to `status -s -b'
[mjg@skimbleshanks Biomath-WS15 (exam $)]✓ git status -s -b
## exam
[mjg@skimbleshanks Biomath-WS15 (exam $)]✓ git ss
fatal: internal error: work tree has already been set
You forgot to mention what version you used. But it's probably related
to d95138e (setup: set env $GIT_WORK_TREE when work tree is set, like
$GIT_DIR - 2015-06-26). This commit fixed your problem (and was
released) but it introduced some other regressions so it's been
reverted in 'next'. 'pu' has a re-fix on top of the revert.
Current worktree: /home/mjg/Teaching/LUK
New worktree: /home/mjg/Teaching/LUK/Biomath-WS15

This is inside the subdir "Biomath-WS15" of the worktree residing in
".../LUK".

It wasn't like that last year ;)

Something about setting GIT_DIR and the like in the environment must
have changed (for aliases), badly interacting with the worktree code.

Michael
-- 
Duy

Re: [BUG?] worktree setup broken in subdirs with git alias

From: Duy Nguyen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:07:39

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Duy Nguyen [off-list ref] wrote:
You forgot to mention what version you used.
Gaaah i need to work on my reading skills. You did mention 'next' in
quoted
sorry I can't dig deeper now, but the worktree code from next seems to
So it matches my expectation. Merge branch
nd/clear-gitenv-upon-use-of-alias to fix it.
-- 
Duy

Re: [BUG?] worktree setup broken in subdirs with git alias

From: Michael J Gruber <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:07:39

Duy Nguyen venit, vidit, dixit 07.01.2016 10:26:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Michael J Gruber
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi there,

sorry I can't dig deeper now, but the worktree code from next seems to
get confused now as soon as you cd to a subdir of a worktree (other than
the main worktree) and use an alias:

git help ss
`git ss' is aliased to `status -s -b'
[mjg@skimbleshanks Biomath-WS15 (exam $)]✓ git status -s -b
## exam
[mjg@skimbleshanks Biomath-WS15 (exam $)]✓ git ss
fatal: internal error: work tree has already been set
You forgot to mention what version you used. But it's probably related
to d95138e (setup: set env $GIT_WORK_TREE when work tree is set, like
$GIT_DIR - 2015-06-26). This commit fixed your problem (and was
released) but it introduced some other regressions so it's been
reverted in 'next'. 'pu' has a re-fix on top of the revert.
Well, I mentioned "from next", which I admit is not super-precise (it's
next not older than a day or two, plus some local additions). In fact it is:

ef7b32d (Sync with 2.7, 2016-01-04)

which "has" d95138e (as per git branch contains) but also df1e6ea87
which reverts it. (I guess --really-contains would be neat but difficult.)

So while I didn't notice the problems that lead to the revert, I noticed
the problems the revert created... Early adopters' luck.

As for the fix on pu, do you mean that one:
ac78663 (run-command: don't warn on SIGPIPE deaths, 2015-12-29)

I'll give it a shot then.

Michael

Re: [BUG?] worktree setup broken in subdirs with git alias

From: Duy Nguyen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:07:39

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Michael J Gruber
[off-list ref] wrote:
As for the fix on pu, do you mean that one:
ac78663 (run-command: don't warn on SIGPIPE deaths, 2015-12-29)
And the three commits before that, if you cherry-pick instead of
merge, so 0d5466d to ac78663
-- 
Duy

Re: [BUG?] worktree setup broken in subdirs with git alias

From: Michael J Gruber <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:07:39

Michael J Gruber venit, vidit, dixit 07.01.2016 10:40:
Duy Nguyen venit, vidit, dixit 07.01.2016 10:26:
quoted
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Michael J Gruber
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi there,

sorry I can't dig deeper now, but the worktree code from next seems to
get confused now as soon as you cd to a subdir of a worktree (other than
the main worktree) and use an alias:

git help ss
`git ss' is aliased to `status -s -b'
[mjg@skimbleshanks Biomath-WS15 (exam $)]✓ git status -s -b
## exam
[mjg@skimbleshanks Biomath-WS15 (exam $)]✓ git ss
fatal: internal error: work tree has already been set
You forgot to mention what version you used. But it's probably related
to d95138e (setup: set env $GIT_WORK_TREE when work tree is set, like
$GIT_DIR - 2015-06-26). This commit fixed your problem (and was
released) but it introduced some other regressions so it's been
reverted in 'next'. 'pu' has a re-fix on top of the revert.
Well, I mentioned "from next", which I admit is not super-precise (it's
next not older than a day or two, plus some local additions). In fact it is:

ef7b32d (Sync with 2.7, 2016-01-04)

which "has" d95138e (as per git branch contains) but also df1e6ea87
which reverts it. (I guess --really-contains would be neat but difficult.)

So while I didn't notice the problems that lead to the revert, I noticed
the problems the revert created... Early adopters' luck.

As for the fix on pu, do you mean that one:
ac78663 (run-command: don't warn on SIGPIPE deaths, 2015-12-29)

I'll give it a shot then.

Michael
Meanwhile you had answered my question before I even asked it. Great
user support over here :)

And hooray, merging ac78663 saves my problem, thanks!

Since I didn't notice the problems that the earlier fix caused I can't
say whether the newer fix avoids them.

Michael
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help