Re: [PATCH v8 0/11] Create ref-filter from for-each-ref

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH v8 0/11] Create ref-filter from for-each-ref

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:05:19

karthik nayak [off-list ref] writes:
The previous version of the patch can be found at :
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/271423

Changes :
* Removed an unnecessary commit (v7 3/12)
* Change a comment in 01/11 (v8)

Total changes :

 Makefile               |    1 +
 builtin/for-each-ref.c | 1108
+++-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 ref-filter.c           | 1101
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 ref-filter.h           |   74 ++++++++
 4 files changed, 1195 insertions(+), 1089 deletions(-)
This round looks good enough to build on top by merging more
interesting bits from tags and branches ;-)  Let's conclude
this series at this round and then incrementally fix if there
is any remaining nits discovered later.

Thanks all.

Re: [PATCH v8 0/11] Create ref-filter from for-each-ref

From: karthik nayak <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:05:19

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
karthik nayak [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
The previous version of the patch can be found at :
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/271423

Changes :
* Removed an unnecessary commit (v7 3/12)
* Change a comment in 01/11 (v8)

Total changes :

 Makefile               |    1 +
 builtin/for-each-ref.c | 1108
+++-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 ref-filter.c           | 1101
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 ref-filter.h           |   74 ++++++++
 4 files changed, 1195 insertions(+), 1089 deletions(-)
This round looks good enough to build on top by merging more
interesting bits from tags and branches ;-)  Let's conclude
this series at this round and then incrementally fix if there
is any remaining nits discovered later.

Thanks all.
Sounds good, thanks for all the suggestions everyone.

-- 
Regards,
Karthik Nayak
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help