[PATCH 1/3] git-verify-pack.txt: fix inconsistent spelling of "packfile"

Subsystems: documentation, the rest

DORMANTno replies

3 messages, 1 author, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH 1/3] git-verify-pack.txt: fix inconsistent spelling of "packfile"

From: Patrick Steinhardt <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:04:48 

Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <redacted>
---
 Documentation/git-verify-pack.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/git-verify-pack.txt b/Documentation/git-verify-pack.txt
index 526ba7b..61ca6d0 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-verify-pack.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-verify-pack.txt
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ OUTPUT FORMAT
 -------------
 When specifying the -v option the format used is:
 
-	SHA-1 type size size-in-pack-file offset-in-packfile
+	SHA-1 type size size-in-packfile offset-in-packfile
 
 for objects that are not deltified in the pack, and
 
-- 
2.4.0

[PATCH 2/3] git-unpack-objects.txt: fix inconsistent spelling of "packfile"

From: Patrick Steinhardt <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:04:48 

Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <redacted>
---
 Documentation/git-unpack-objects.txt | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/git-unpack-objects.txt b/Documentation/git-unpack-objects.txt
index 12cb108..894d20b 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-unpack-objects.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-unpack-objects.txt
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ the objects contained within and writing them into the repository in
 "loose" (one object per file) format.
 
 Objects that already exist in the repository will *not* be unpacked
-from the pack-file.  Therefore, nothing will be unpacked if you use
-this command on a pack-file that exists within the target repository.
+from the packfile.  Therefore, nothing will be unpacked if you use
+this command on a packfile that exists within the target repository.
 
 See linkgit:git-repack[1] for options to generate
 new packs and replace existing ones.
-- 
2.4.0

[PATCH 3/3] pack-protocol.txt: fix insconsistent spelling of "packfile"

From: Patrick Steinhardt <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:04:48 

Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <redacted>
---
 Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt b/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
index 462e206..812d857 100644
--- a/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
+++ b/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
@@ -502,11 +502,11 @@ MUST NOT send a push-cert command.  When a push-cert command is
 sent, command-list MUST NOT be sent; the commands recorded in the
 push certificate is used instead.
 
-The pack-file MUST NOT be sent if the only command used is 'delete'.
+The packfile MUST NOT be sent if the only command used is 'delete'.
 
-A pack-file MUST be sent if either create or update command is used,
+A packfile MUST be sent if either create or update command is used,
 even if the server already has all the necessary objects.  In this
-case the client MUST send an empty pack-file.   The only time this
+case the client MUST send an empty packfile.   The only time this
 is likely to happen is if the client is creating
 a new branch or a tag that points to an existing obj-id.
 
-- 
2.4.0
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help