Re: "HEAD -> branch" decoration doesn't work with "--decorate=full"

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: "HEAD -> branch" decoration doesn't work with "--decorate=full"

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:04:45

Michael Haggerty [off-list ref] writes:
The new-style "HEAD -> branch" style decoration doesn't work when
"--decorate=full" is used:
...
Was that an oversight or a conscious decision?
I do not recall making such a decision, and I doubt (the other)
Michael wanted that way, either, so patches welcome, perhaps?

Re: "HEAD -> branch" decoration doesn't work with "--decorate=full"

From: Michael J Gruber <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:04:45

Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 13.05.2015 16:51:
Michael Haggerty [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
The new-style "HEAD -> branch" style decoration doesn't work when
"--decorate=full" is used:
...
Was that an oversight or a conscious decision?
I do not recall making such a decision, and I doubt (the other)
Michael wanted that way, either, so patches welcome, perhaps?
I was not aware of an alternate codepath for full decorations (and am
surprised about it).

I can't look into this before next week, but --decorate=full should
produce "HEAD -> refs/heads/master" and such.

I even vaguely remember testing it, but that may have been for v1 which
turned different knobs than the end version.

Michael
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help