Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2015, #07; Fri, 20)

"Kyle J. McKay" [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Will cook in 'next'.

Has this been merged to 'next'?  Even fetching
github.com/gitster/git.git I'm only seeing it in pu:

That was a short-hand for "will merge and cook in 'next'" ;-)

I had an impression that the series may see at least one reroll to
polish it further before it gets ready for 'next', as I only saw
discussions on the tangent (e.g. possible futures) and didn't see
serious reviews of the code that we will actually be using.

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 08:20:58PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

I had an impression that the series may see at least one reroll to
polish it further before it gets ready for 'next', as I only saw
discussions on the tangent (e.g. possible futures) and didn't see
serious reviews of the code that we will actually be using.

If people have suggestions on how to improve it, I'm eager to hear them
and submit a reroll or follow-up patches, as appropriate.  Making
changes now would be much better than having to do it down the line.
-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187