Re: Regression and failure to clone/fetch with new code Re: git-svn performance

(apology for the empty message again - sticky fingers in smart phone...)

------------------------------
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 08:46 GMT Eric Wong wrote:

quoted hunk

Thanks, I'm not able to reproduce the issue, but can you try the
following?

diff --git a/perl/Git/SVN/Ra.pm b/perl/Git/SVN/Ra.pm
index 75cdac9..82d6108 100644
--- a/perl/Git/SVN/Ra.pm
+++ b/perl/Git/SVN/Ra.pm

@@ -153,6 +153,7 @@ sub url {

sub check_path {
    my ($self, $path, $r) = @_;
    my $cache = $self->{cache}->{check_path};
+    $r = int($r);
    if ($r == $cache->{r} && exists $cache->{data}->{$path}) {
        return $cache->{data}->{$path};
    }

@@ -169,6 +170,7 @@ sub check_path {

sub get_dir {
    my ($self, $dir, $r) = @_;
    my $cache = $self->{cache}->{get_dir};
+    $r = int($r);
    if ($r == $cache->{r}) {
        if (my $x = $cache->{data}->{$dir}) {
            return wantarray ? @$x : $x->[0];
---

I added those two lines to my git and there is no improvement. It still won't svn fetch the next
revision. I think it may be important/interesting to find out when or how it becomes non-int,
so I have tar'gz'ed my wont-fetch virtual box .git and in the middle of uploading here: 

http://sourceforge.net/projects/outmodedbonsai/files/R/

I am also uploading my old R clone also - maybe you'd like to see why its .git/svn/.caches
is so big compared to a recent one, as well as how and why there were an extra merge
and two missing merges compared to a recent clone?

(FYI - I have some local stuff on my old R clone. They are mostly
there because the R devs don't agree etc but there is nothing confidential about them).