Re: [PATCH v17 16/48] refs.c: add an err argument to delete_ref_loose

The series applies cleanly up to 25/48 or so to 'master', but this
step already breaks tests, at least t1400 but possibly others.

Please do not make me bisect X-<.

Thanks.

Let me redo it so it applies to current master.

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

The series applies cleanly up to 25/48 or so to 'master', but this
step already breaks tests, at least t1400 but possibly others.

Please do not make me bisect X-<.

Thanks.

Thanks.

I have rebased it on current master and re-sent it as v18

I passes all tests, except t0008 which is unrelated to this series.

regards
ronnie sahlberg


On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Ronnie Sahlberg [off-list ref] wrote:

Let me redo it so it applies to current master.

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

The series applies cleanly up to 25/48 or so to 'master', but this
step already breaks tests, at least t1400 but possibly others.

Please do not make me bisect X-<.

Thanks.