t9001 used a '\n' in a sed expression to split one line into two lines,
but the usage of '\n' in the "replacement string" is not portable.
The '\n' can be used to match a newline in the "pattern space",
but otherwise the meaning of '\n' is unspecified in POSIX.
- Gnu versions of sed will treat '\n' as a newline character.
- Other versions of sed (like /usr/bin/sed under Mac OS X)
simply ignore the '\' before the 'n', treating '\n' as 'n'.
For reference see:
pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/sed.html
http://www.gnu.org/software/sed/manual/sed.html
As the test already requires perl as a prerequisite, use perl instead of sed.
Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <redacted>
---
Sending a V3 patch seems "spammish", but after re-reading all
the comments I think that the commit msg should point out the difference
between POSIX sed and gnu sed somewhat better.
t/t9001-send-email.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/t/t9001-send-email.sh b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
index 64d9434..19a3ced 100755
--- a/t/t9001-send-email.sh
+++ b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
@@ -1342,7 +1342,7 @@ test_cover_addresses () {
git format-patch --cover-letter -2 -o outdir &&
cover=`echo outdir/0000-*.patch` &&
mv $cover cover-to-edit.patch &&
- sed "s/^From:/$header: extra@address.com\nFrom:/" cover-to-edit.patch >"$cover" &&
+ perl -pe "s/^From:/$header: extra\@address.com\nFrom:/" cover-to-edit.patch >"$cover" &&
git send-email \
--force \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \--
2.0.0.553.ged01b91
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Torsten Bögershausen [off-list ref] wrote:
t9001 used a '\n' in a sed expression to split one line into two lines,
but the usage of '\n' in the "replacement string" is not portable.
The '\n' can be used to match a newline in the "pattern space",
but otherwise the meaning of '\n' is unspecified in POSIX.
- Gnu versions of sed will treat '\n' as a newline character.
- Other versions of sed (like /usr/bin/sed under Mac OS X)
simply ignore the '\' before the 'n', treating '\n' as 'n'.
For reference see:
pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/sed.html
http://www.gnu.org/software/sed/manual/sed.html
As the test already requires perl as a prerequisite, use perl instead of sed.
René Scharfe pointed out this useful resource [1] for writing portable
'sed' when he fixed [2] a problem on NetBSD in a test I had written.
[1]: http://sed.sourceforge.net/sedfaq4.html
[2]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/231654
quoted hunk
Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <redacted>
---
Sending a V3 patch seems "spammish", but after re-reading all
the comments I think that the commit msg should point out the difference
between POSIX sed and gnu sed somewhat better.
t/t9001-send-email.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/t/t9001-send-email.sh b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
index 64d9434..19a3ced 100755
--- a/t/t9001-send-email.sh
+++ b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
@@ -1342,7 +1342,7 @@ test_cover_addresses () {
git format-patch --cover-letter -2 -o outdir &&
cover=`echo outdir/0000-*.patch` &&
mv $cover cover-to-edit.patch &&
- sed "s/^From:/$header: extra@address.com\nFrom:/" cover-to-edit.patch >"$cover" &&
+ perl -pe "s/^From:/$header: extra\@address.com\nFrom:/" cover-to-edit.patch >"$cover" &&
git send-email \
--force \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--2.0.0.553.ged01b91