Re: [PATCH] t6006-*.sh: Fix truncation tests
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:01:16
Alexey Shumkin [off-list ref] writes:
AFAIU, Junio already applied my patches (existance of a branch as/pretty-truncate tells us that). So, we can only send other patches that fix errors brought with former patches.
No, NO, NOOOOO.... The existence of a branch merely means that I saw the patches, and that I thought that the series was not completely useless. In other words, it indicates that I wanted to make sure that I won't forget about the topic, and it was worth my time to create the branch and apply there for that purpose. Please do not read anything more than that. Presense of a topic branch by itself does not say that I _read_ the patches or I thought they did not need reroll. When such a branch is merged to 'next', that means I read the patches myself, or I saw somebody whose judgement I and others in the community trust read them and gave a positive response or an Ack, and that I decided that the topic is in a good enough shape to be worked on further with incremental updates. You are talking about the latter state, but as/pretty-truncate is in the former state.