Re: Recording the current branch on each commit?

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: Recording the current branch on each commit?

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:00:54

Felipe Contreras [off-list ref] writes:
Except that in this case virtually everyone agreed the default was wrong. I
already said that.

Clarly you didn't read the relevant discussions where everyone, including Linus
Torvalds, agreed. Did you?
My recollection is that everybody agreed that the default was
wrong.  I do not think I saw everybody agreed the patch you are
championing is the right solution to solve that problem.

Re: Recording the current branch on each commit?

From: Felipe Contreras <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:00:54

Junio C Hamano wrote:
Felipe Contreras [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Except that in this case virtually everyone agreed the default was wrong. I
already said that.

Clarly you didn't read the relevant discussions where everyone, including Linus
Torvalds, agreed. Did you?
My recollection is that everybody agreed that the default was
wrong.  I do not think I saw everybody agreed the patch you are
championing is the right solution to solve that problem.
I'm going to add the quote you removed:
quoted
James Denholm wrote:
quoted
You neglect the possibility that your personal view of what git should be
differs from other people's.
In this context James was talking about what Git should be. But the vast
majority agree on this issue, so that's not what's preventing change.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help