[BUG] remote.pushdefault and branch.<name>.pushremote definition order
From: Jack Nagel <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:59:59
There seems to be a difference in the behavior of "git push" depending on whether remote.pushdefault is defined before or after branch.<name>.pushremote in .git/config. If remote.pushdefault is defined to be "origin", and later in the file, branch.master.pushremote is defined to be "upstream", then a plain "git push" from master errors out because I haven't provided a refspec or configured push.default. This makes sense. However, if the order of the two in the file is reversed, then a plain "git push" pushes to the "origin" repository, even though I have set the pushremote for master to "upstream". This appears to be a bug. I would expect the order that things are defined in the config file to have no effect on the behavior of "git push". I have reproduced this using git 1.9.0 and 1.8.3.4. Thanks, Jack