Re: [PATCH] git-contacts: do not fail parsing of good diffs

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH] git-contacts: do not fail parsing of good diffs

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:59:57

larsbj@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
If a line in a patch starts with "--- " it will be deemed
malformed unless it also contains the proper diff header
format. This situation can happen with a valid patch if
it has a line starting with "-- " and that line is removed.

This patch just removes the check in git-contacts.

Signed-off-by: Lars Gullik Bjønnes <redacted>
---
If the script wanted to be "more correct", it should be paying
attention to the $len it already parses out of the hunk headers to
make sure it does not mistake removal of a line that begins with "--
" as the beginning of a patch to a different path, but as the
original does not seem to aim to be so careful anyway, this change
should be OK, I would say.

The patch was whitespace damaged, by the way.  It was easy to hand
tweak so there is no need to resend this particular patch, but if
you are planning to send more patches, please check your MUA and
tell it not to.

Thanks.
quoted hunk
 contrib/contacts/git-contacts | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/contrib/contacts/git-contacts b/contrib/contacts/git-contacts
index 428cc1a..dbe2abf 100755
--- a/contrib/contacts/git-contacts
+++ b/contrib/contacts/git-contacts
@@ -96,8 +96,6 @@ sub scan_patches {
                next unless $id;
                if (m{^--- (?:a/(.+)|/dev/null)$}) {
                        $source = $1;
-               } elsif (/^--- /) {
-                       die "Cannot parse hunk source: $_\n";
                } elsif (/^@@ -(\d+)(?:,(\d+))?/ && $source) {
                        my $len = defined($2) ? $2 : 1;
                        push @{$sources->{$source}{$id}}, [$1, $len] if $len;
-- 
1.9.0

Re: [PATCH] git-contacts: do not fail parsing of good diffs

From: Lars Gullik Bjønnes <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:59:58

On 19 February 2014 00:14, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
[...]
The patch was whitespace damaged, by the way.  It was easy to hand
tweak so there is no need to resend this particular patch, but if
you are planning to send more patches, please check your MUA and
tell it not to.
Suits me right for doing cut-n-paste. Emacs/Gnus usually does not do
stupid things
like that.

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help