Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Current code makes pack-objects always do check_pack_crc() in
unpack_entry() even if right after that we find out there's a cached
version and pack access is not needed. Swap two code blocks, search
for cached version first, then check crc.
[...]
Interesting.
This is only triggered inside pack-objects, which would read a lot
of data from existing packs, and the overhead for looking up the
entry from the revindex, faulting in the actual packdata, and
computing and comparing the crc would not be trivial, especially as
the cost is incurred over many objects we need to untangle in the
delta chain. If you have interesting numbers to show how much this
improves the performance, I am curious to see it.
I can't see anything wrong with the patch, but then I haven't stared too
hard. (It seems that my conversion around abe601b (sha1_file: remove
recursion in unpack_entry, 2013-03-27) was faithful on this point, the
problem has existed for longer than that.)
I tried the perf script below, but at least for the git repo the only
thing I can see is noise.
--- 8< --- t/perf/p5300-pack-object.sh --- 8< ---
#!/bin/sh
test_description="Tests object packing performance"
. ./perf-lib.sh
test_perf_default_repo
test_perf 'pack-objects on commits in HEAD' '
git rev-list HEAD |
git pack-objects --stdout >/dev/null
'
test_perf 'pack-objects on all of HEAD' '
git rev-list --objects HEAD |
git pack-objects --stdout >/dev/null
'
test_done
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Thomas Rast [off-list ref] wrote:
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Current code makes pack-objects always do check_pack_crc() in
unpack_entry() even if right after that we find out there's a cached
version and pack access is not needed. Swap two code blocks, search
for cached version first, then check crc.
[...]
quoted
Interesting.
This is only triggered inside pack-objects, which would read a lot
of data from existing packs, and the overhead for looking up the
entry from the revindex, faulting in the actual packdata, and
computing and comparing the crc would not be trivial, especially as
the cost is incurred over many objects we need to untangle in the
delta chain. If you have interesting numbers to show how much this
improves the performance, I am curious to see it.
No I don't have any timing numbers. I just updated the code to see how
many times crc is checked and how many times we find a cached version
after crc is checked. The numbers with git.git are 353535 and 113257
respectively. IOW we could reduce the number of crc checks by 30%.
I can't see anything wrong with the patch, but then I haven't stared too
hard. (It seems that my conversion around abe601b (sha1_file: remove
recursion in unpack_entry, 2013-03-27) was faithful on this point, the
problem has existed for longer than that.)
I tried the perf script below, but at least for the git repo the only
thing I can see is noise.
--stdout does not set do_check_packed_object_crc, you need to run
pack-objects without --stdout (i.e. the real use case is repack)
quoted hunk
--- 8< --- t/perf/p5300-pack-object.sh --- 8< ---
#!/bin/sh
test_description="Tests object packing performance"
. ./perf-lib.sh
test_perf_default_repo
test_perf 'pack-objects on commits in HEAD' '
git rev-list HEAD |
git pack-objects --stdout >/dev/null
'
test_perf 'pack-objects on all of HEAD' '
git rev-list --objects HEAD |
git pack-objects --stdout >/dev/null
'
test_done
--
Duy
On Sat, 14 Sep 2013, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Thomas Rast [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I tried the perf script below, but at least for the git repo the only
thing I can see is noise.
--stdout does not set do_check_packed_object_crc, you need to run
pack-objects without --stdout (i.e. the real use case is repack)
And for those who might wonder why, you can have a look at the
description for commit 0e8189e2708b. This was probably one of my best
commit logs ever. ;-)
This commit also provides a hint about the cost of over-checking the
CRC.
Nicolas