2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:58:29
Eric Sunshine [off-list ref] writes:
This set of patches was meant to be a re-roll of [1] addressing Junio's comments, however [1] graduated to 'next' before I found time to work on it further, so these are instead incremental patches atop 'next'.
Just FYI, 'next' will be rewound once the upcoming release is done, so we have a chance to rewind and squash.
From: Eric Sunshine <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:58:29
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Eric Sunshine [off-list ref] writes:quoted
This set of patches was meant to be a re-roll of [1] addressing Junio's comments, however [1] graduated to 'next' before I found time to work on it further, so these are instead incremental patches atop 'next'.Just FYI, 'next' will be rewound once the upcoming release is done, so we have a chance to rewind and squash.
How would we go about this? Is there something I can do to streamline the squashing? Unfortunately, the various fix-up patches do not have a one-to-one correspondence to the original three patches in 'next'.