Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] unify appending of sob

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] unify appending of sob

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:56:00

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Brandon Casey wrote:
quoted
Round 3.
Thanks for a pleasant read.  My only remaining observations are
cosmetic, except for a portability question in Duy's test script, a
small behavior change when the commit message ends with an
RFC2822-style header with no trailing newline and the possibility of
tightening the pattern in sequencer.c to match the strictness of
format-patch (which could easily wait for a later patch).
Thanks for a quick review.  I agree that this series is getting very
close with your help.
Unless Brandon and/or Jonathan wants to have another chance to
excise warts from the recorded history by rerolling the entire
series one more time, I think what we have queued is in a good
enough shape to merge to 'next' and any further improvement and fix
can be done incrementally.

OK?  Or "stop, I want to reroll"?

I'll wait for a day or two.

Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] unify appending of sob

From: Brandon Casey <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:56:01

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Brandon Casey wrote:
quoted
Round 3.
Thanks for a pleasant read.  My only remaining observations are
cosmetic, except for a portability question in Duy's test script, a
small behavior change when the commit message ends with an
RFC2822-style header with no trailing newline and the possibility of
tightening the pattern in sequencer.c to match the strictness of
format-patch (which could easily wait for a later patch).
Thanks for a quick review.  I agree that this series is getting very
close with your help.
Unless Brandon and/or Jonathan wants to have another chance to
excise warts from the recorded history by rerolling the entire
series one more time, I think what we have queued is in a good
enough shape to merge to 'next' and any further improvement and fix
can be done incrementally.

OK?  Or "stop, I want to reroll"?

I'll wait for a day or two.
Let's hold off so I can do another round.  I worked on this last night
and was able to simplify some things nicely.  I'll try to finish up
tonight and resubmit.

-Brandon
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help