Re: Python version auditing followup

3 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: Python version auditing followup

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:34

esr@thyrsus.com (Eric S. Raymond) writes:
That was the first of three patches I have promised.  In order to do
the next one, which will be a development guidelines recommend
compatibility back to some specific version X, I need a policy
decision.  How do we set X?

I don't think X can be < 2.4, nor does it need to be - 2.4 came out
in 2004 and eight years is plenty of deployment time.

The later we set it, the more convenient for developers.  But of
course by setting it late we trade away some portability to 
older systems.

In previous discussion of this issue I recommended X = 2.6.
That is still my recommendation. Thoughts, comments, objections?
I personally would think 2.6 is recent enough.  Which platforms that
are long-term-maintained by their vendors still pin their Python at
2.4.X?  2.4.6 was in 2008 that was source only, 2.4.4 was in late
2006 that was the last 2.4 with binary release.

Objections?  Comments?

Re: Python version auditing followup

From: Joachim Schmitz <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:34

Junio C Hamano wrote:
esr@thyrsus.com (Eric S. Raymond) writes:
quoted
That was the first of three patches I have promised.  In order to do
the next one, which will be a development guidelines recommend
compatibility back to some specific version X, I need a policy
decision.  How do we set X?

I don't think X can be < 2.4, nor does it need to be - 2.4 came out
in 2004 and eight years is plenty of deployment time.

The later we set it, the more convenient for developers.  But of
course by setting it late we trade away some portability to
older systems.

In previous discussion of this issue I recommended X = 2.6.
That is still my recommendation. Thoughts, comments, objections?
I personally would think 2.6 is recent enough.  Which platforms that
are long-term-maintained by their vendors still pin their Python at
2.4.X?  2.4.6 was in 2008 that was source only, 2.4.4 was in late
2006 that was the last 2.4 with binary release.

Objections?  Comments?
We have a working 2.4.2 for HP-NonStop and some major problems getting 2.7.3 
to work.

Bye, Jojo 

Re: Python version auditing followup

From: Dennis Kaarsemaker <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:36

On do, 2012-12-20 at 10:30 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Which platforms that are long-term-maintained by their vendors still
pin their Python at 2.4.X? 
RHEL 5.x and its clones still use python 2.4. It is supported by red hat
until at least 2017 (though end of production phase two, Q1 2014, seems
like a reasonable cut-off point).
-- 
Dennis Kaarsemaker
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help