[PATCH 0/5] jk/send-email-sender-prompt loose ends

DORMANTno replies

8 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH 0/5] jk/send-email-sender-prompt loose ends

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:27

Here are the cleanups and refactorings split out from my
jk/send-email-sender-prompt series. They can go right on master and are
independent of Felipe's fc/send-email-no-sender-prompt topic.

  [1/5]: test-lib: allow negation of prerequisites

Same as before. I think this is a useful feature for the test suite (and
2/5 depends on it).

  [2/5]: t7502: factor out autoident prerequisite

Same as before. Patch 5/5 depends on it.

  [3/5]: ident: make user_ident_explicitly_given static

Same as before. Cleanup.

  [4/5]: ident: keep separate "explicit" flags for author and committer

Same as before. Cleanup. I do not know if anybody will ever care about
the corner cases it fixes, so it is really just being defensive for
future code.

  [5/5]: t: add tests for "git var"

Tests split out from he "git var can take multiple values" patch.

Dropped were:

  - "git var" can take multiple values. Nobody really cares about doing
    so, and it's an external interface, so we'd have to support it
    forever.

  - exporting "explicit ident" flag via "git var"; same reasoning as
    above

  - Git.pm supporting explicit ident; ditto

  - send-email prompting change; obsoleted by Felipe's patch

-Peff

[PATCH 1/5] test-lib: allow negation of prerequisites

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:27

You can set and test a prerequisite like this:

  test_set_prereq FOO
  test_have_prereq FOO && echo yes

You can negate the test in the shell like this:

  ! test_have_prereq && echo no

However, when you are using the automatic prerequisite
checking in test_expect_*, there is no opportunity to use
the shell negation.  This patch introduces the syntax "!FOO"
to indicate that the test should only run if a prerequisite
is not meant.

One alternative is to set an explicit negative prerequisite,
like:

  if system_has_foo; then
	  test_set_prereq FOO
  else
	  test_set_prereq NO_FOO
  fi

However, this doesn't work for lazy prerequisites, which
associate a single test with a single name. We could teach
the lazy prereq evaluator to set both forms, but the code
change ends up quite similar to this one (because we still
need to convert NO_FOO into FOO to find the correct lazy
script).

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <redacted>
---
 t/t0000-basic.sh        | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 t/test-lib-functions.sh | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/t/t0000-basic.sh b/t/t0000-basic.sh
index 08677df..562cf41 100755
--- a/t/t0000-basic.sh
+++ b/t/t0000-basic.sh
@@ -115,6 +115,38 @@ then
 	exit 1
 fi
 
+test_lazy_prereq LAZY_TRUE true
+havetrue=no
+test_expect_success LAZY_TRUE 'test runs if lazy prereq is satisfied' '
+	havetrue=yes
+'
+donthavetrue=yes
+test_expect_success !LAZY_TRUE 'missing lazy prereqs skip tests' '
+	donthavetrue=no
+'
+
+if test "$havetrue$donthavetrue" != yesyes
+then
+	say 'bug in test framework: lazy prerequisites do not work'
+	exit 1
+fi
+
+test_lazy_prereq LAZY_FALSE false
+nothavefalse=no
+test_expect_success !LAZY_FALSE 'negative lazy prereqs checked' '
+	nothavefalse=yes
+'
+havefalse=yes
+test_expect_success LAZY_FALSE 'missing negative lazy prereqs will skip' '
+	havefalse=no
+'
+
+if test "$nothavefalse$havefalse" != yesyes
+then
+	say 'bug in test framework: negative lazy prerequisites do not work'
+	exit 1
+fi
+
 clean=no
 test_expect_success 'tests clean up after themselves' '
 	test_when_finished clean=yes
diff --git a/t/test-lib-functions.sh b/t/test-lib-functions.sh
index 8889ba5..22a4f8f 100644
--- a/t/test-lib-functions.sh
+++ b/t/test-lib-functions.sh
@@ -275,6 +275,15 @@ test_have_prereq () {
 
 	for prerequisite
 	do
+		case "$prerequisite" in
+		!*)
+			negative_prereq=t
+			prerequisite=${prerequisite#!}
+			;;
+		*)
+			negative_prereq=
+		esac
+
 		case " $lazily_tested_prereq " in
 		*" $prerequisite "*)
 			;;
@@ -294,10 +303,20 @@ test_have_prereq () {
 		total_prereq=$(($total_prereq + 1))
 		case "$satisfied_prereq" in
 		*" $prerequisite "*)
+			satisfied_this_prereq=t
+			;;
+		*)
+			satisfied_this_prereq=
+		esac
+
+		case "$satisfied_this_prereq,$negative_prereq" in
+		t,|,t)
 			ok_prereq=$(($ok_prereq + 1))
 			;;
 		*)
-			# Keep a list of missing prerequisites
+			# Keep a list of missing prerequisites; restore
+			# the negative marker if necessary.
+			prerequisite=${negative_prereq:+!}$prerequisite
 			if test -z "$missing_prereq"
 			then
 				missing_prereq=$prerequisite
-- 
1.8.0.207.gdf2154c

[PATCH 2/5] t7502: factor out autoident prerequisite

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:27

t7502 checks the behavior of commit when we can and cannot
determine a valid committer ident. Let's move that into
test-lib as a lazy prerequisite so other scripts can use it.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <redacted>
---
 t/t7502-commit.sh | 12 +-----------
 t/test-lib.sh     |  6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t7502-commit.sh b/t/t7502-commit.sh
index deb187e..1a5cb69 100755
--- a/t/t7502-commit.sh
+++ b/t/t7502-commit.sh
@@ -243,16 +243,6 @@ test_expect_success 'message shows author when it is not equal to committer' '
 	  .git/COMMIT_EDITMSG
 '
 
-test_expect_success 'setup auto-ident prerequisite' '
-	if (sane_unset GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL &&
-	    sane_unset GIT_COMMITTER_NAME &&
-	    git var GIT_COMMITTER_IDENT); then
-		test_set_prereq AUTOIDENT
-	else
-		test_set_prereq NOAUTOIDENT
-	fi
-'
-
 test_expect_success AUTOIDENT 'message shows committer when it is automatic' '
 
 	echo >>negative &&
@@ -271,7 +261,7 @@ echo editor started > "$(pwd)/.git/result"
 exit 0
 EOF
 
-test_expect_success NOAUTOIDENT 'do not fire editor when committer is bogus' '
+test_expect_success !AUTOIDENT 'do not fire editor when committer is bogus' '
 	>.git/result
 	>expect &&
 
diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
index 489bc80..0334a9e 100644
--- a/t/test-lib.sh
+++ b/t/test-lib.sh
@@ -738,6 +738,12 @@ test_lazy_prereq UTF8_NFD_TO_NFC '
 	esac
 '
 
+test_lazy_prereq AUTOIDENT '
+	sane_unset GIT_AUTHOR_NAME &&
+	sane_unset GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL &&
+	git var GIT_AUTHOR_IDENT
+'
+
 # When the tests are run as root, permission tests will report that
 # things are writable when they shouldn't be.
 test -w / || test_set_prereq SANITY
-- 
1.8.0.207.gdf2154c

[PATCH 3/5] ident: make user_ident_explicitly_given static

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:27

In v1.5.6-rc0~56^2 (2008-05-04) "user_ident_explicitly_given"
was introduced as a global for communication between config,
ident, and builtin-commit.  In v1.7.0-rc0~72^2 (2010-01-07)
readers switched to using the common wrapper
user_ident_sufficiently_given().  After v1.7.11-rc1~15^2~18
(2012-05-21), the var is only written in ident.c.

Now we can make it static, which will enable further
refactoring without worrying about upsetting other code.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <redacted>
---
 cache.h | 4 ----
 ident.c | 6 +++++-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
index dbd8018..50d9eea 100644
--- a/cache.h
+++ b/cache.h
@@ -1149,10 +1149,6 @@ struct config_include_data {
 #define CONFIG_INCLUDE_INIT { 0 }
 extern int git_config_include(const char *name, const char *value, void *data);
 
-#define IDENT_NAME_GIVEN 01
-#define IDENT_MAIL_GIVEN 02
-#define IDENT_ALL_GIVEN (IDENT_NAME_GIVEN|IDENT_MAIL_GIVEN)
-extern int user_ident_explicitly_given;
 extern int user_ident_sufficiently_given(void);
 
 extern const char *git_commit_encoding;
diff --git a/ident.c b/ident.c
index a4bf206..733d69d 100644
--- a/ident.c
+++ b/ident.c
@@ -10,7 +10,11 @@
 static struct strbuf git_default_name = STRBUF_INIT;
 static struct strbuf git_default_email = STRBUF_INIT;
 static char git_default_date[50];
-int user_ident_explicitly_given;
+
+#define IDENT_NAME_GIVEN 01
+#define IDENT_MAIL_GIVEN 02
+#define IDENT_ALL_GIVEN (IDENT_NAME_GIVEN|IDENT_MAIL_GIVEN)
+static int user_ident_explicitly_given;
 
 #ifdef NO_GECOS_IN_PWENT
 #define get_gecos(ignored) "&"
-- 
1.8.0.207.gdf2154c

[PATCH 4/5] ident: keep separate "explicit" flags for author and committer

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:27

We keep track of whether the user ident was given to us
explicitly, or if we guessed at it from system parameters
like username and hostname. However, we kept only a single
variable. This covers the common cases (because the author
and committer will usually come from the same explicit
source), but can miss two cases:

  1. GIT_COMMITTER_* is set explicitly, but we fallback for
     GIT_AUTHOR. We claim the ident is explicit, even though
     the author is not.

  2. GIT_AUTHOR_* is set and we ask for author ident, but
     not committer ident. We will claim the ident is
     implicit, even though it is explicit.

This patch uses two variables instead of one, updates both
when we set the "fallback" values, and updates them
individually when we read from the environment.

Rather than keep user_ident_sufficiently_given as a
compatibility wrapper, we update the only two callers to
check the committer_ident, which matches their intent and
what was happening already.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <redacted>
---
 builtin/commit.c |  4 ++--
 cache.h          |  3 ++-
 ident.c          | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/commit.c b/builtin/commit.c
index 1dd2ec5..d6dd3df 100644
--- a/builtin/commit.c
+++ b/builtin/commit.c
@@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ static int prepare_to_commit(const char *index_file, const char *prefix,
 				ident_shown++ ? "" : "\n",
 				author_ident->buf);
 
-		if (!user_ident_sufficiently_given())
+		if (!committer_ident_sufficiently_given())
 			status_printf_ln(s, GIT_COLOR_NORMAL,
 				_("%s"
 				"Committer: %s"),
@@ -1265,7 +1265,7 @@ static void print_summary(const char *prefix, const unsigned char *sha1,
 		strbuf_addstr(&format, "\n Author: ");
 		strbuf_addbuf_percentquote(&format, &author_ident);
 	}
-	if (!user_ident_sufficiently_given()) {
+	if (!committer_ident_sufficiently_given()) {
 		strbuf_addstr(&format, "\n Committer: ");
 		strbuf_addbuf_percentquote(&format, &committer_ident);
 		if (advice_implicit_identity) {
diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
index 50d9eea..18fdd18 100644
--- a/cache.h
+++ b/cache.h
@@ -1149,7 +1149,8 @@ struct config_include_data {
 #define CONFIG_INCLUDE_INIT { 0 }
 extern int git_config_include(const char *name, const char *value, void *data);
 
-extern int user_ident_sufficiently_given(void);
+extern int committer_ident_sufficiently_given(void);
+extern int author_ident_sufficiently_given(void);
 
 extern const char *git_commit_encoding;
 extern const char *git_log_output_encoding;
diff --git a/ident.c b/ident.c
index 733d69d..ac9672f 100644
--- a/ident.c
+++ b/ident.c
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ static char git_default_date[50];
 #define IDENT_NAME_GIVEN 01
 #define IDENT_MAIL_GIVEN 02
 #define IDENT_ALL_GIVEN (IDENT_NAME_GIVEN|IDENT_MAIL_GIVEN)
-static int user_ident_explicitly_given;
+static int committer_ident_explicitly_given;
+static int author_ident_explicitly_given;
 
 #ifdef NO_GECOS_IN_PWENT
 #define get_gecos(ignored) "&"
@@ -113,7 +114,8 @@ const char *ident_default_email(void)
 
 		if (email && email[0]) {
 			strbuf_addstr(&git_default_email, email);
-			user_ident_explicitly_given |= IDENT_MAIL_GIVEN;
+			committer_ident_explicitly_given |= IDENT_MAIL_GIVEN;
+			author_ident_explicitly_given |= IDENT_MAIL_GIVEN;
 		} else
 			copy_email(xgetpwuid_self(), &git_default_email);
 		strbuf_trim(&git_default_email);
@@ -331,6 +333,10 @@ const char *fmt_name(const char *name, const char *email)
 
 const char *git_author_info(int flag)
 {
+	if (getenv("GIT_AUTHOR_NAME"))
+		author_ident_explicitly_given |= IDENT_NAME_GIVEN;
+	if (getenv("GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL"))
+		author_ident_explicitly_given |= IDENT_MAIL_GIVEN;
 	return fmt_ident(getenv("GIT_AUTHOR_NAME"),
 			 getenv("GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL"),
 			 getenv("GIT_AUTHOR_DATE"),
@@ -340,16 +346,16 @@ const char *git_author_info(int flag)
 const char *git_committer_info(int flag)
 {
 	if (getenv("GIT_COMMITTER_NAME"))
-		user_ident_explicitly_given |= IDENT_NAME_GIVEN;
+		committer_ident_explicitly_given |= IDENT_NAME_GIVEN;
 	if (getenv("GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL"))
-		user_ident_explicitly_given |= IDENT_MAIL_GIVEN;
+		committer_ident_explicitly_given |= IDENT_MAIL_GIVEN;
 	return fmt_ident(getenv("GIT_COMMITTER_NAME"),
 			 getenv("GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL"),
 			 getenv("GIT_COMMITTER_DATE"),
 			 flag);
 }
 
-int user_ident_sufficiently_given(void)
+static int ident_is_sufficient(int user_ident_explicitly_given)
 {
 #ifndef WINDOWS
 	return (user_ident_explicitly_given & IDENT_MAIL_GIVEN);
@@ -358,6 +364,16 @@ int user_ident_sufficiently_given(void)
 #endif
 }
 
+int committer_ident_sufficiently_given(void)
+{
+	return ident_is_sufficient(committer_ident_explicitly_given);
+}
+
+int author_ident_sufficiently_given(void)
+{
+	return ident_is_sufficient(author_ident_explicitly_given);
+}
+
 int git_ident_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *data)
 {
 	if (!strcmp(var, "user.name")) {
@@ -365,7 +381,8 @@ int git_ident_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *data)
 			return config_error_nonbool(var);
 		strbuf_reset(&git_default_name);
 		strbuf_addstr(&git_default_name, value);
-		user_ident_explicitly_given |= IDENT_NAME_GIVEN;
+		committer_ident_explicitly_given |= IDENT_NAME_GIVEN;
+		author_ident_explicitly_given |= IDENT_NAME_GIVEN;
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -374,7 +391,8 @@ int git_ident_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *data)
 			return config_error_nonbool(var);
 		strbuf_reset(&git_default_email);
 		strbuf_addstr(&git_default_email, value);
-		user_ident_explicitly_given |= IDENT_MAIL_GIVEN;
+		committer_ident_explicitly_given |= IDENT_MAIL_GIVEN;
+		author_ident_explicitly_given |= IDENT_MAIL_GIVEN;
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-- 
1.8.0.207.gdf2154c

[PATCH 5/5] t: add tests for "git var"

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:27

We do not currently have any explicit tests for "git var" at
all (though we do exercise it to some degree as a part of
other tests). Let's add a few basic sanity checks.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <redacted>
---
 t/t0007-git-var.sh | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 t/t0007-git-var.sh
diff --git a/t/t0007-git-var.sh b/t/t0007-git-var.sh
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..5868a87
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t0007-git-var.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+test_description='basic sanity checks for git var'
+. ./test-lib.sh
+
+test_expect_success 'get GIT_AUTHOR_IDENT' '
+	test_tick &&
+	echo "$GIT_AUTHOR_NAME <$GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL> $GIT_AUTHOR_DATE" >expect &&
+	git var GIT_AUTHOR_IDENT >actual &&
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'get GIT_COMMITTER_IDENT' '
+	test_tick &&
+	echo "$GIT_COMMITTER_NAME <$GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL> $GIT_COMMITTER_DATE" >expect &&
+	git var GIT_COMMITTER_IDENT >actual &&
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success !AUTOIDENT 'requested identites are strict' '
+	(
+		sane_unset GIT_COMMITTER_NAME &&
+		sane_unset GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL &&
+		test_must_fail git var GIT_COMMITTER_IDENT
+	)
+'
+
+# For git var -l, we check only a representative variable;
+# testing the whole output would make our test too brittle with
+# respect to unrelated changes in the test suite's environment.
+test_expect_success 'git var -l lists variables' '
+	git var -l >actual &&
+	echo "$GIT_AUTHOR_NAME <$GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL> $GIT_AUTHOR_DATE" >expect &&
+	sed -n s/GIT_AUTHOR_IDENT=//p <actual >actual.author &&
+	test_cmp expect actual.author
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git var -l lists config' '
+	git var -l >actual &&
+	echo false >expect &&
+	sed -n s/core\\.bare=//p <actual >actual.bare &&
+	test_cmp expect actual.bare
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'listing and asking for variables are exclusive' '
+	test_must_fail git var -l GIT_COMMITTER_IDENT
+'
+
+test_done
-- 
1.8.0.207.gdf2154c

[PATCH 6/5] t9001: check send-email behavior with implicit sender

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:27

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 01:25:35PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
Here are the cleanups and refactorings split out from my
jk/send-email-sender-prompt series. They can go right on master and are
independent of Felipe's fc/send-email-no-sender-prompt topic.
[...]
Dropped were:
[...]
  - send-email prompting change; obsoleted by Felipe's patch
Here is one more patch pulling out the extra tests from my final commit.
It needs to go on top of the merge of Felipe's series and the one I just
sent. The former because of the new prompting behavior, and the latter
because of the AUTOIDENT prerequisites.

If it's simpler, my whole series can just go on top of Felipe's patch
(or vice versa).

-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] t9001: check send-email behavior with implicit sender

We allow send-email to use an implicitly-defined identity
for the sender (because there is still a confirmation step),
but we abort when we cannot generate such an identity. Let's
make sure that we test this.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <redacted>
---
 t/t9001-send-email.sh | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t/t9001-send-email.sh b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
index c5d66cf..27edfa8 100755
--- a/t/t9001-send-email.sh
+++ b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
@@ -201,6 +201,34 @@ test_expect_success $PREREQ 'Prompting works' '
 		grep "^To: to@example.com\$" msgtxt1
 '
 
+test_expect_success $PREREQ,AUTOIDENT 'implicit ident is allowed' '
+       clean_fake_sendmail &&
+       (sane_unset GIT_AUTHOR_NAME &&
+	sane_unset GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL &&
+	sane_unset GIT_COMMITTER_NAME &&
+	sane_unset GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL &&
+	GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY=1 git send-email \
+		--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
+		--to=to@example.com \
+		$patches \
+		</dev/null 2>errors
+       )
+'
+
+test_expect_success $PREREQ,!AUTOIDENT 'broken implicit ident aborts send-email' '
+       clean_fake_sendmail &&
+       (sane_unset GIT_AUTHOR_NAME &&
+	sane_unset GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL &&
+	sane_unset GIT_COMMITTER_NAME &&
+	sane_unset GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL &&
+	GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY=1 && export GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY &&
+	test_must_fail git send-email \
+		--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
+		$patches </dev/null 2>errors &&
+	test_i18ngrep "tell me who you are" errors
+       )
+'
+
 test_expect_success $PREREQ 'tocmd works' '
 	clean_fake_sendmail &&
 	cp $patches tocmd.patch &&
-- 
1.8.0.207.gdf2154c

Re: [PATCH 0/5] jk/send-email-sender-prompt loose ends

From: Felipe Contreras <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:55:27

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:
Here are the cleanups and refactorings split out from my
jk/send-email-sender-prompt series. They can go right on master and are
independent of Felipe's fc/send-email-no-sender-prompt topic.

  [1/5]: test-lib: allow negation of prerequisites

Same as before. I think this is a useful feature for the test suite (and
2/5 depends on it).

  [2/5]: t7502: factor out autoident prerequisite

Same as before. Patch 5/5 depends on it.

  [3/5]: ident: make user_ident_explicitly_given static

Same as before. Cleanup.

  [4/5]: ident: keep separate "explicit" flags for author and committer

Same as before. Cleanup. I do not know if anybody will ever care about
the corner cases it fixes, so it is really just being defensive for
future code.

  [5/5]: t: add tests for "git var"

Tests split out from he "git var can take multiple values" patch.

Dropped were:

  - "git var" can take multiple values. Nobody really cares about doing
    so, and it's an external interface, so we'd have to support it
    forever.

  - exporting "explicit ident" flag via "git var"; same reasoning as
    above

  - Git.pm supporting explicit ident; ditto

  - send-email prompting change; obsoleted by Felipe's patch
For what it's worth; they look good to me. However, I think it's worth
mentioning that there are no functional changes.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help