Hi,
creating bundles from some repositories seems to lead to bundles with
incorrectly formatted headers, at least with git >= 1.7.2. When cloning
from such bundles, git prints the following error/warning:
$ git clone perl-clone.bundle perl-clone
Cloning into 'perl-clone'...
warning: unrecognized header: --work around mangled archname on...
This can be reproduced easily with git from any version >= 1.7.2 or from
master, using the following steps:
git clone git://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git perl
GIT_DIR=perl/.git git bundle create perl-clone.bundle --all
git clone perl-clone.bundle perl-clone
The content of the bundle is:
# v2 git bundle
-- work around mangled archname on win32 while finding...
39ec54a59ce332fc44e553f4e5eeceef88e8369e refs/heads/blead
39ec54a59ce332fc44e553f4e5eeceef88e8369e refs/remotes/origin/HEAD
...
The "--work around mangled archname..." line is rather long, so I've
omitted most of it. What it contains is a series of commit messages all
combined into a single line. It appears that this line is the problem
because it's neither a comment (like '#v2 git bundle') nor a SHA1
followed by a ref name.
Note that this problem does not occur with all repositories. A bundle
created from a test repository with a single text file and just one
commit does not have this problem.
Note also that "git clone <bundle> <dest>" does not fail with corrupted
bundles if the git version is something like 1.7.2 or 1.7.7.6. Those
version print the above warning but still succeed in cloning. "git
clone" from master however treats this as an error and fails.
Without any knowledge of how git works internally, I would assume that
this is either a bug in how bundles are created, or a hint at a slightly
broken perl repository (other's have the same thing though, perhaps it
is because of a conversion from another SCM software to git in the
past). Does this sound reasonable?
Is there a way to work around this or fix it properly? I'm not sure what
lead to the decision to no longer ignore unrecognized headers in git
master, would it be sensible to revert this change if nothing can be
done to solve this during bundle creation?
- Jannis
From: Thomas Rast <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:53:07
The first part of the bundle header contains the boundary commits, and
could be approximated by
# v2 git bundle
$(git rev-list --pretty=oneline --boundary <ARGS> | grep ^-)
git-bundle actually spawns exactly this rev-list invocation, and does
the grepping internally.
There was a subtle bug in the latter step: it used fgets() with a
1024-byte buffer. If the user has sufficiently long subjects (e.g.,
by not adhering to the git oneline-subject convention in the first
place), the 'oneline' format can easily overflow the buffer. fgets()
then returns the rest of the line in the next call(s). If one of
these remaining parts started with '-', git-bundle would mistakenly
insert it into the bundle thinking it was a boundary commit.
Fix it by using strbuf_getwholeline() instead, which handles arbitrary
line lengths correctly.
Note that on the receiving side in parse_bundle_header() we were
already using strbuf_getwholeline_fd(), so that part is safe.
Reported-by: Jannis Pohlmann <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <redacted>
---
bundle.c | 14 +++++++-------
t/t5704-bundle.sh | 17 +++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
@@ -59,4 +59,21 @@ test_expect_success 'empty bundle file is rejected' ''+# If "ridiculous" is at least 1004 chars, this traps a bug in old+# versions where the resulting 1025-char line (with --pretty=oneline)+# was longer than a 1024-char buffer+test_expect_success'ridiculously long subject in boundary''++:>file4&&+test_tick&&+gitaddfile4&&+printf"abcdefghijkl %s\n"$(seq1100)|gitcommit-F-&&+test_commitfifth&&+gitbundlecreatelong-subject-bundle.bdlHEAD^..HEAD&&+gitfetchlong-subject-bundle.bdl&&+sed-n"/^-/{p;q}"long-subject-bundle.bdl>boundary&&+grep"^-$_x40 "boundary++'+ test_done
From: Thomas Rast <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:53:07
The comment even said that it should eventually go there. While at
it, match the calling convention and name of the function to the
strbuf_get*line family. So it now is strbuf_getwholeline_fd.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <redacted>
---
I was left looking for strbuf_readline_fd() for a while, then tried to
look for the readline() from the libc that it would presumably match.
Hence this cleanup.
bundle.c | 21 ++-------------------
strbuf.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
strbuf.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
@@ -23,23 +23,6 @@ static void add_to_ref_list(const unsigned char *sha1, const char *name,list->nr++;}-/* Eventually this should go to strbuf.[ch] */-staticintstrbuf_readline_fd(structstrbuf*sb,intfd)-{-strbuf_reset(sb);--while(1){-charch;-ssize_tlen=xread(fd,&ch,1);-if(len<=0)-returnlen;-strbuf_addch(sb,ch);-if(ch=='\n')-break;-}-return0;-}-staticintparse_bundle_header(intfd,structbundle_header*header,constchar*report_path){
@@ -47,7 +30,7 @@ static int parse_bundle_header(int fd, struct bundle_header *header,intstatus=0;/* The bundle header begins with the signature */-if(strbuf_readline_fd(&buf,fd)||+if(strbuf_getwholeline_fd(&buf,fd,'\n')||strcmp(buf.buf,bundle_signature)){if(report_path)error("'%s' does not look like a v2 bundle file",
@@ -57,7 +40,7 @@ static int parse_bundle_header(int fd, struct bundle_header *header,}/* The bundle header ends with an empty line */-while(!strbuf_readline_fd(&buf,fd)&&+while(!strbuf_getwholeline_fd(&buf,fd,'\n')&&buf.len&&buf.buf[0]!='\n'){unsignedcharsha1[20];intis_prereq=0;
From: Øyvind A. Holm <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:53:07
On 22 February 2012 17:05, Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
Hi,
creating bundles from some repositories seems to lead to bundles with
incorrectly formatted headers, at least with git >= 1.7.2. When
cloning from such bundles, git prints the following error/warning:
$ git clone perl-clone.bundle perl-clone
Cloning into 'perl-clone'...
warning: unrecognized header: --work around mangled archname on...
This can be reproduced easily with git from any version >= 1.7.2 or
from master, using the following steps:
git clone git://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git perl
GIT_DIR=perl/.git git bundle create perl-clone.bundle --all
git clone perl-clone.bundle perl-clone
The content of the bundle is:
# v2 git bundle
-- work around mangled archname on win32 while finding...
39ec54a59ce332fc44e553f4e5eeceef88e8369e refs/heads/blead
39ec54a59ce332fc44e553f4e5eeceef88e8369e refs/remotes/origin/HEAD
Have researched this a bit, and I've found that all git versions back to
when git-bundle was introduced (around v1.5.4) produces the same invalid
line. The culprit is commit 3e8148feadabd0d0b1869fcc4d218a6475a5b0bc in
perl.git, branch 'maint-5.005'. The log message of that commit contains
email headers, maybe that's the reason git bundle gets confused?
Øyvind
From: Øyvind A. Holm <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:53:07
On 22 February 2012 21:25, Øyvind A. Holm [off-list ref] wrote:
On 22 February 2012 17:05, Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
quoted
creating bundles from some repositories seems to lead to bundles
with incorrectly formatted headers, at least with git >= 1.7.2. When
cloning from such bundles, git prints the following error/warning:
$ git clone perl-clone.bundle perl-clone
Cloning into 'perl-clone'...
warning: unrecognized header: --work around mangled archname on...
Have researched this a bit, and I've found that all git versions back
to when git-bundle was introduced (around v1.5.4) produces the same
invalid line. The culprit is commit
3e8148feadabd0d0b1869fcc4d218a6475a5b0bc in perl.git, branch
'maint-5.005'. The log message of that commit contains email headers,
maybe that's the reason git bundle gets confused?
...or maybe because the log message doesn't contain any empty lines, so
they're joined together into an insanely long line. I've seen this
behaviour before, in git-am or git-apply, I think. Anyway, when the
bundle doesn't contain this commit, the line is not present.
Øyvind
From: Jeff King <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:53:07
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:34:22PM +0100, Thomas Rast wrote:
The comment even said that it should eventually go there. While at
it, match the calling convention and name of the function to the
strbuf_get*line family. So it now is strbuf_getwholeline_fd.
[...]
bundle.c | 21 ++-------------------
strbuf.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
strbuf.h | 1 +
Nit: no update to Documentation/technical/api-strbuf.txt.
You might want to also mention that this will read() one byte at a time,
and is therefore only a good idea if you really care about the position
of the fd. Otherwise, fdopen() + strbuf_getwholeline() is much more
efficient.
-Peff
From: Jeff King <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:53:07
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:34:23PM +0100, Thomas Rast wrote:
+# If "ridiculous" is at least 1004 chars, this traps a bug in old
+# versions where the resulting 1025-char line (with --pretty=oneline)
+# was longer than a 1024-char buffer
+test_expect_success 'ridiculously long subject in boundary' '
+
+ : > file4 &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git add file4 &&
+ printf "abcdefghijkl %s\n" $(seq 1 100) | git commit -F - &&
Seq is not portable. I usually use either
perl -le "print for (1..100)"
or just do:
z16=zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
z256=$z16$z16$z16$z16$z16$z16$z16$z16
z1024=$z256$z256$z256$z256$z256$z256$z256$z256
-Peff
I usually use either
perl -le "print for (1..100)"
or just do:
z16=zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
z256=$z16$z16$z16$z16$z16$z16$z16$z16
z1024=$z256$z256$z256$z256$z256$z256$z256$z256
If a sequence of ASCII zeros is good enough, you can also do:
printf %02134d 0
-- Hannes
From: Erik Faye-Lund <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:53:08
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Øyvind A. Holm [off-list ref] wrote:
On 22 February 2012 17:05, Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
quoted
Hi,
creating bundles from some repositories seems to lead to bundles with
incorrectly formatted headers, at least with git >= 1.7.2. When
cloning from such bundles, git prints the following error/warning:
$ git clone perl-clone.bundle perl-clone
Cloning into 'perl-clone'...
warning: unrecognized header: --work around mangled archname on...
This can be reproduced easily with git from any version >= 1.7.2 or
from master, using the following steps:
git clone git://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git perl
GIT_DIR=perl/.git git bundle create perl-clone.bundle --all
git clone perl-clone.bundle perl-clone
The content of the bundle is:
# v2 git bundle
-- work around mangled archname on win32 while finding...
39ec54a59ce332fc44e553f4e5eeceef88e8369e refs/heads/blead
39ec54a59ce332fc44e553f4e5eeceef88e8369e refs/remotes/origin/HEAD
Have researched this a bit, and I've found that all git versions back to
when git-bundle was introduced (around v1.5.4) produces the same invalid
line. The culprit is commit 3e8148feadabd0d0b1869fcc4d218a6475a5b0bc in
perl.git, branch 'maint-5.005'. The log message of that commit contains
email headers, maybe that's the reason git bundle gets confused?