Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy [off-list ref] writes:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 01:26:43PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
Nice. Will queue
Please also squash this in (resend looks ugly and it's hard to point
out changes). It makes the code look less ugly, use Q_() for gettext
poisoning and revert am input text back as Jonathan suggested.
I take it --summary is un-i18n-able,...
... because?
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 01:26:43PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
Nice. Will queue
Please also squash this in (resend looks ugly and it's hard to point
out changes). It makes the code look less ugly, use Q_() for gettext
poisoning and revert am input text back as Jonathan suggested.
I take it --summary is un-i18n-able,...
... because?
.. of scripts? We have --numstat for scripts, but I see no alternative
to --summary. Does anybody parse --summary output?
--
Duy
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 08:11:23AM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
quoted
quoted
I take it --summary is un-i18n-able,...
... because?
.. of scripts? We have --numstat for scripts, but I see no alternative
to --summary. Does anybody parse --summary output?
I would think it is spelled "--raw".
-Peff