Re: [PATCH 1/4] config: add include directive

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH 1/4] config: add include directive

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:52:52

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
And then because of 1a and 2a, most programs should Just Work without
any changes, but because of 1b and 2b, any special uses will have to
decide manually whether they would want to allow includes.

Does that make sense?
In short, the "git config" interface defaults to "--no-includes" when
reading from an explicit file with "-f" and "--includes" otherwise, which
sounds like a 100% sensible default to me.
I had a similar thought while writing it, but hoped the sentence after
(that you snipped) would make it clear.
I think the whole paragraph makes it reasonably clear; I was merely being
pedantic to see if you or others can come up with a clear and simple way
to rephrase it that can also satisfy such pedantry.
How about:

  The included file is processed immediately, before any other
  directives from the surrounding file.

What I wanted to make clear there is the ordering, which sometimes
matters.
Hmm, I think the original is probably easier to read.
The one use I think is to bundle a bunch of related config options, and
then turn them on selectively.
...
but with this patch, you can do:

  cat >~/.gitconfig.foo <<-\EOF
  [foo]
  one = 1
  two = 2
  EOF
  git -c include.path=$HOME/.gitconfig.foo blah
That is quite a sensible use case actually.

Thanks.

Re: [PATCH 1/4] config: add include directive

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:52:52

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 09:23:59PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
And then because of 1a and 2a, most programs should Just Work without
any changes, but because of 1b and 2b, any special uses will have to
decide manually whether they would want to allow includes.

Does that make sense?
In short, the "git config" interface defaults to "--no-includes" when
reading from an explicit file with "-f" and "--includes" otherwise, which
sounds like a 100% sensible default to me.
Yes, exactly. Thank you for explaining it in about 1/10 the words I
needed to use. :)

I'll put that behavior in the re-roll.
quoted
How about:

  The included file is processed immediately, before any other
  directives from the surrounding file.

What I wanted to make clear there is the ordering, which sometimes
matters.
Hmm, I think the original is probably easier to read.
OK, then I'll leave it unless somebody else wants to come up with
something brilliant.

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help