Kirill Smelkov [off-list ref] writes:
Starting from GNU Make 3.82 $(wildcard ...) no longer sorts the result
(from NEWS):
* WARNING: Backward-incompatibility!
Wildcards were not documented as returning sorted values, but the results
have been sorted up until this release.. If your makefiles require sorted
results from wildcard expansions, use the $(sort ...) function to request
it explicitly.
http://repo.or.cz/w/make.git/commitdiff/2a59dc32aaf0681dec569f32a9d7ab88a379d34f
so we have to sort tests list or else they are executed in seemingly
random order even for -j1.
I do not necessarily buy your "so we HAVE TO, OR ELSE".
Even though I can understand "We can sort the list of tests _if_ we do not
want them executed in seemingly random order when running 'make -j1'", I
tend to think that *if* is a big one. Aren't these tests designed not to
depend on each other anyway?
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 02:01:51PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Kirill Smelkov [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Starting from GNU Make 3.82 $(wildcard ...) no longer sorts the result
(from NEWS):
* WARNING: Backward-incompatibility!
Wildcards were not documented as returning sorted values, but the results
have been sorted up until this release.. If your makefiles require sorted
results from wildcard expansions, use the $(sort ...) function to request
it explicitly.
http://repo.or.cz/w/make.git/commitdiff/2a59dc32aaf0681dec569f32a9d7ab88a379d34f
so we have to sort tests list or else they are executed in seemingly
random order even for -j1.
I do not necessarily buy your "so we HAVE TO, OR ELSE".
Even though I can understand "We can sort the list of tests _if_ we do not
want them executed in seemingly random order when running 'make -j1'", I
tend to think that *if* is a big one. Aren't these tests designed not to
depend on each other anyway?
Yes, they don't depend on each other, but what's the point in not
sorting them? I usually watch test progress visually, and if tests are
sorted, even with make -j4 they go more or less incrementally by their t
number.
On my netbook, adding $(sort ...) adds approximately 0.008s to make
startup, so imho there is no performance penalty to adding that sort.
Thanks,
Kirill