On Dec 1, 2011 4:03 AM, "Pete Wyckoff" [off-list ref] wrote:
I see your point. P4 labels are the only way that they support
tagging, apparently. I'm okay with leaving label support in
git-p4. And it will be nice if Luke makes it behave a bit
better. But doing heroics to emulate cross-commit tags feels
like a lot of work, and the wrong direction.
Agreed. Lets keep it simple.
--
Vitor Antunes
On 01/12/11 21:59, Vitor Antunes wrote:
On Dec 1, 2011 4:03 AM, "Pete Wyckoff"[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I see your point. P4 labels are the only way that they support
tagging, apparently. I'm okay with leaving label support in
git-p4. And it will be nice if Luke makes it behave a bit
better. But doing heroics to emulate cross-commit tags feels
like a lot of work, and the wrong direction.
Agreed. Lets keep it simple.
I think I'm going to have to go away and do a bit more work on this. The
existing label code is still quite buggy (or my understanding is
broken). Either way I'd rather get it to the point where it actually
works and passes all its tests.
The two issues I'm seeing are:
- two p4 labels covering the same set of files; only one of them gets
imported.
- if you have a p4 label on a subset of files then it gets dropped
(which is fine) but so do most of the other labels (as far as I can tell).
I think if this could be made to work it would actually be really useful
though.
(Pete - I've found your previous email; not sure why I didn't see it
before. I'll roll that change in with what I'm doing).
Regards!
Luke