Michael J Gruber [off-list ref] writes:
I do prefer the rotated, vertically stacked +-G though (with + <-> t, -
<-> i, G <-> 3/4-circle with arrow). Good thing we don't have to argue
about an "official" logo...
It somehow reminds me of the OGC logo fiasco, though.
Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 02.11.2011 10:18:
Michael J Gruber [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
I do prefer the rotated, vertically stacked +-G though (with + <-> t, -
<-> i, G <-> 3/4-circle with arrow). Good thing we don't have to argue
about an "official" logo...
It somehow reminds me of the OGC logo fiasco, though.
:)
While looking up "OGC logo fiasco" certainly was fun, I don't think that
our msysgit logo, e.g., is prone to wild fantasies' misinterpretation,
no matter the position, uhm, rotation:
http://code.google.com/p/msysgit/downloads/detail?name=gitlogo.svg
But maybe my fantasy is not wild enough.
Michael
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Michael J Gruber
[off-list ref] wrote:
Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 02.11.2011 10:18:
quoted
Michael J Gruber [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
I do prefer the rotated, vertically stacked +-G though (with + <-> t, -
<-> i, G <-> 3/4-circle with arrow). Good thing we don't have to argue
about an "official" logo...
It somehow reminds me of the OGC logo fiasco, though.
:)
While looking up "OGC logo fiasco" certainly was fun, I don't think that
our msysgit logo, e.g., is prone to wild fantasies' misinterpretation,
no matter the position, uhm, rotation:
http://code.google.com/p/msysgit/downloads/detail?name=gitlogo.svg
But maybe my fantasy is not wild enough.
Since I'm kind of a typography and design geek and I pretty much hate
the execution of current logos I've seen, I thought I'd give it a go
myself ;)
What do you think?