Re: [PATCH/RFCv3 2/2] receive-pack: don't pass non-existent refs to post-{receive,update} hooks in push deletions

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH/RFCv3 2/2] receive-pack: don't pass non-existent refs to post-{receive,update} hooks in push deletions

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:52:08

Pang Yan Han [off-list ref] writes:
I am unable to reply this until much later, but are the tests in this patch ok?
It's the first time I'm writing test cases for git.
I'll squash in a bit more updates and later publish the result.
Thanks.

Re: [PATCH/RFCv3 2/2] receive-pack: don't pass non-existent refs to post-{receive,update} hooks in push deletions

From: Pang Yan Han <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:52:08

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 04:28:11PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Pang Yan Han [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
I am unable to reply this until much later, but are the tests in this patch ok?
It's the first time I'm writing test cases for git.
I'll squash in a bit more updates and later publish the result.
Thanks.
Hi Junio,

Thank you for correcting my many amateur mistakes!

Sorry for asking, but do I need to reroll this with the fixup in
origin/ph/push-to-delete-nothing ? Is the commit message fine especially
in light of the changes in the fixup?

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help