Re: How to check out the repository at a particular point in time

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: How to check out the repository at a particular point in time

From: Randal L. Schwartz <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:51:54

quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"Andreas" == Andreas Ericsson [off-list ref] writes:
Andreas> Whatever, really. The fact that pretty much everyone seems to know
Andreas> what a branch is and how it works in git after a (very) brief intro
Andreas> to it means it's either right on target or that people are so used to
Andreas> the fact that branch means something different in every scm that they
Andreas> don't even bother loading the word with some preconceived notion that
Andreas> used to be right in cvs.

It does lead to confusion though, and once you *really* understand that
a branch is a point, not a line, you can do a lot more cool things with
git, and rebase and stash make a lot more sense.

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
[off-list ref] <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion

Re: How to check out the repository at a particular point in time

From: Michael Witten <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:51:54

On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 15:48, Randal L. Schwartz [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"Andreas" == Andreas Ericsson [off-list ref] writes:
Andreas> Whatever, really. The fact that pretty much everyone seems to know
Andreas> what a branch is and how it works in git after a (very) brief intro
Andreas> to it means it's either right on target or that people are so used to
Andreas> the fact that branch means something different in every scm that they
Andreas> don't even bother loading the word with some preconceived notion that
Andreas> used to be right in cvs.

It does lead to confusion though, and once you *really* understand that
a branch is a point, not a line, you can do a lot more cool things with
git, and rebase and stash make a lot more sense.
Indeed. I don't think Andreas is correct in the assertion that
"everyone seems to know what a branch is and how it works in git after
a (very) brief intro". Rather, I think it is just the case that
everyone seems to know how to use the basic public interface for
branches after a (very) brief intro, and that many tasks allow
everyone to get away with having wrongheaded ideas.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help