Jon Seymour [off-list ref] writes:
This extension to js/bisect-no-checkout adds support for bisecting bare repositories.
It does this by relaxing the requirement that git bisect is invoked in a repository with a working tree and by defaulting to --no-checkout in the case of a bare repository.
Two tests are included to demonstrate this behaviour.
I'd wrap the long line myself but next time please be careful.
quoted hunk
diff --git a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
index 4fb7d11..62125ec 100755
--- a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
+++ b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
@@ -592,6 +592,37 @@ test_expect_success 'erroring out when using bad path parameters' '
grep "bad path parameters" error.txt
'
+test_expect_success 'test bisection on bare repo - --no-checkout specified' '
+ git clone --bare . bare.nocheckout &&
+ (
+ cd bare.nocheckout &&
+ git bisect start --no-checkout &&
+ git bisect good $HASH1 &&
+ git bisect bad $HASH4 &&
+ git bisect run eval \
+ "test \$(git rev-list BISECT_HEAD ^$HASH2 --max-count=1 | wc -l) = 0" \
+ >../nocheckout.log &&
+ git bisect reset
+ ) &&
+ grep "$HASH3 is the first bad commit" nocheckout.log
+'
git-bisect does not have any cd_to_toplevel so with a working tree you can
run a bisection from a subdirectory, it seems. I wonder what would happen
if you did "cd bare.nocheckout/objects" or something silly like that.
Just wondering...
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Jon Seymour [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
This extension to js/bisect-no-checkout adds support for bisecting bare repositories.
It does this by relaxing the requirement that git bisect is invoked in a repository with a working tree and by defaulting to --no-checkout in the case of a bare repository.
Two tests are included to demonstrate this behaviour.
I'd wrap the long line myself but next time please be careful.
quoted
diff --git a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
index 4fb7d11..62125ec 100755
--- a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
+++ b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
@@ -592,6 +592,37 @@ test_expect_success 'erroring out when using bad path parameters' '
grep "bad path parameters" error.txt
'
+test_expect_success 'test bisection on bare repo - --no-checkout specified' '
+ git clone --bare . bare.nocheckout &&
+ (
+ cd bare.nocheckout &&
+ git bisect start --no-checkout &&
+ git bisect good $HASH1 &&
+ git bisect bad $HASH4 &&
+ git bisect run eval \
+ "test \$(git rev-list BISECT_HEAD ^$HASH2 --max-count=1 | wc -l) = 0" \
+ >../nocheckout.log &&
+ git bisect reset
+ ) &&
+ grep "$HASH3 is the first bad commit" nocheckout.log
+'
git-bisect does not have any cd_to_toplevel so with a working tree you can
run a bisection from a subdirectory, it seems. I wonder what would happen
if you did "cd bare.nocheckout/objects" or something silly like that.
Just wondering...
Well, nothing obviously breaks...
expecting success:
git clone --bare . bare.silly &&
(
cd bare.silly/objects &&
git bisect start &&
git bisect good $HASH1 &&
git bisect bad $HASH4 &&
git bisect run eval \
"test \$(git rev-list BISECT_HEAD ^$HASH2 --max-count=1 | wc -l) = 0" \
>../../silly.log &&
git bisect reset
) &&
grep "$HASH3 is the first bad commit" silly.log
Cloning into bare repository bare.silly...
done.
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 1 step)
[3de952f2416b6084f557ec417709eac740c6818c] Add <3: Another new day for
git> into <hello>.
3de952f2416b6084f557ec417709eac740c6818c is the first bad commit