Re: [PATCH 3/5] setup_revisions: remember whether a ref was positive or not

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH 3/5] setup_revisions: remember whether a ref was positive or not

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:51:46

Sverre Rabbelier [off-list ref] writes:
Nobody needs the stuff you mentioned right now.
Wrong.

"diff ^C A B" is a bug, isn't it? And that is a bug in the current code.
quoted
I would be reluctant to accept a myopic hack that is only good for one
caller and that needs to be ripped out and re-done, especially when we
already know other issues that can be solved cleanly if you go a little
further in the initial round.
While I understand this reluctance, remember that this "one caller" is
required to fix a bug in the current code.

Re: [PATCH 3/5] setup_revisions: remember whether a ref was positive or not

From: Sverre Rabbelier <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:51:46

Heya,

On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 00:07, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Sverre Rabbelier [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Nobody needs the stuff you mentioned right now.
Wrong.

"diff ^C A B" is a bug, isn't it? And that is a bug in the current code.
I think I missed something, can you point me to the relevant thread
about this bug in diff? Maybe I can convince the people involved in
fixing that to help out.

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help