Re: [PATCH 1/2] gitattributes: Clarify discussion of attribute macros

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gitattributes: Clarify discussion of attribute macros

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:51:44

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
I don't know if that was intentional, or if the behavior is simply
accidental and the original code was simply never meant to have
"-binary" called at all.
The latter. You were never expected to say -macro at all.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gitattributes: Clarify discussion of attribute macros

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:51:44

On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 02:40:19PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
I don't know if that was intentional, or if the behavior is simply
accidental and the original code was simply never meant to have
"-binary" called at all.
The latter. You were never expected to say -macro at all.
OK. Maybe we should flag an error, then? Or if not, then make the
documentation more clear that it's not allowed (or even say the current
behavior is reasonable, and document it).

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help