Re: [PATCH 02/18] config: Introduce functions to write non-standard file

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

Is there a need for this "config_exclusive_filename" hackery at all?

I was thinking the result would look more like:
...

Exactly my thought. I think I suggested the same to Ramkumar earlier and
he said he will re-roll but perhaps this is a series before that exchange.

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 02:26:13PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Is there a need for this "config_exclusive_filename" hackery at all?

I was thinking the result would look more like:
...

Exactly my thought. I think I suggested the same to Ramkumar earlier and
he said he will re-roll but perhaps this is a series before that exchange.

This one is incrementally better than the initial one, but I still think
it doesn't go far enough.

-Peff

Hi Jeff and others,

Jeff King writes:

This one is incrementally better than the initial one, but I still think
it doesn't go far enough.

Thanks for showing me how to do this correctly.
I was waiting for reviews on other patches before re-rolling, but
there don't seem to be any more -- I'll send out a new
"sequencer-stable" series with this change and the "Please, " nit
corrected shortly; it's what I'm basing my post mid-term work on.

-- Ram