Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add a lot of dummy returns to avoid warnings with NO_NORETURN

Andi Kleen [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

I would need to clarify with s/introduce noise/introduce more noise/; the
existing codebase is not noise-free.

But I do not see much point in making things worse, only to squelch
"reaches end of non void function" warnings that will be given under the
NO_NORETURN workaround configuration.

Can you please give specific guidance what I should do to make
the patchkit acceptable?

I am inclined to apply only 1 and 3, which is what I already have on 'pu'.

I am inclined to apply only 1 and 3, which is what I already have on 'pu'.

Thanks. 

I guess should add some documentation that explains that there
are additional warnings (and some general pointers). I'll send that
in another patch.

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.