Hello,
Did anyone experiment with Windows permissions for a Git repository
located on a Windows network share?
Is it a sensible scheme in order to have a central repository with ACLs
(notably some group can read/write, some other group can only read)
without the need to set up a dedicated server (ala Gitolite) ?
(Assuming a Windows network share infrastructure is already in place...)
TIA
Jérôme
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Jerome Lovy
[off-list ref] wrote:
Hello,
Did anyone experiment with Windows permissions for a Git repository located
on a Windows network share?
Is it a sensible scheme in order to have a central repository with ACLs
(notably some group can read/write, some other group can only read) without
the need to set up a dedicated server (ala Gitolite) ?
(Assuming a Windows network share infrastructure is already in place...)
I don't know about Windows but any OS/file-system level ACL system
that has more granularity than the usual user/group/other, ought to
work fine.
The only thing gitolite can add is branch-level permissions, which it
doesn't sound like you need.
[Of course, I like to think that the config file in gitolite is a much
cleaner way of setting, reviewing, changing, and tracking changes of,
permissions, but I'm biased ;-)]
Le 18/05/2011 10:52, Sitaram Chamarty a écrit :
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Jerome Lovy
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hello,
Did anyone experiment with Windows permissions for a Git repository located
on a Windows network share?
Is it a sensible scheme in order to have a central repository with ACLs
(notably some group can read/write, some other group can only read) without
the need to set up a dedicated server (ala Gitolite) ?
(Assuming a Windows network share infrastructure is already in place...)
I don't know about Windows but any OS/file-system level ACL system
that has more granularity than the usual user/group/other, ought to
work fine.
The only thing gitolite can add is branch-level permissions, which it
doesn't sound like you need.
[Of course, I like to think that the config file in gitolite is a much
cleaner way of setting, reviewing, changing, and tracking changes of,
permissions, but I'm biased ;-)]
In this respect, Gitolite has a good point indeed with the auditing
possibility, thanks to change tracking.