Here is one who wants to tackle potentially a low-hanging fruit.
$ git cat-file -p 4cd96ce446ab653325a0e47fad73e94c99c57dd2
error: unable to find 4cd96ce446ab653325a0e47fad73e94c99c57dd2
fatal: Not a valid object name 4cd96ce446ab653325a0e47fad73e94c99c57dd2
This looks sensible and understandable, even though you could argue that
we don't have to say the same thing twice. In the same repository:
$ git show 4cd96ce446ab653325a0e47fad73e94c99c57dd3
fatal: bad object 4cd96ce446ab653325a0e47fad73e94c99c57dd3
This is bad, as it sounds as if we found the named object but it is
corrupt.
[Sorry Junio, accidentally sent this to just you the first time around]
If "git show" is invoked on a hash for a file that doesn't exist, the
produced error message was "fatal: bad object <hash>". This is
misleading as the object isn't bad, but missing. As a matter of fact, if
an object is bad, this error message is never produced, because
parse_object() terminates with its own error message if the object is
corrupt.
This patch introduces a check to see whether an object exists (with the
appropriate error message if it doesn't) and removes the unnecessary and
misleading original error message if parse_object() fails.
Signed-off-by: Jakob Pfender <redacted>
---
revision.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
index 86d2470..085aac2 100644
--- a/revision.c
+++ b/revision.c
@@ -173,9 +173,9 @@ static struct object *get_reference(struct rev_info
*revs, const char *name, con
{
struct object *object;
+ if (sha1_object_info(sha1, NULL) < 0)
+ die("Not a valid object name %s", name);
object = parse_object(sha1);
- if (!object)
- die("bad object %s", name);
object->flags |= flags;
return object;
}
--
1.7.0.4