set-upstream for existing branch...?

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

set-upstream for existing branch...?

From: Miles Bader <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:50:35

Is there a convenient, intuitive, way to set (or change) @{upstream} for
the current branch, without doing anything else...?

Thanks,

-Miles

-- 
Run away!  Run away!

Re: set-upstream for existing branch...?

From: Jay Soffian <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:50:35

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Miles Bader [off-list ref] wrote:
Is there a convenient, intuitive, way to set (or change) @{upstream} for
the current branch, without doing anything else...?
$ git branch <current_branch> --set-upstream <new_upstream>

But note that this is deceptive: what's important is the relative
positions of <current_branch> and <new_upstream> on the command-line,
and they must be in that order. It doesn't (currently) matter where
you place the --set-upstream.

I've got it on my todo list to make --set-upstream take <new_upstream>
as its argument so that you can just say:

$ git branch --set-upstream <new_upstream>

j.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help