Re: [PATCH/RFC] t800?-blame.sh: retitle uniquely

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH/RFC] t800?-blame.sh: retitle uniquely

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:50:14

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 05:12:29PM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:
quoted
On a related note to J6t's patch, how's the stance on unique titles?
Unique numbers are important for partial test runs, of course,
but unique titles help finding you way through the test.
There are more than the blame.sh ones.
I don't think it is a big deal, but I did just 5 minutes ago get annoyed
at:

  t7500-commit.sh
  t7501-commit.sh
  t7502-commit.sh
  t7509-commit.sh
t7509 seems to be about the authorship, so it is easy to rename it to
t7509-commit-authorship or something, but unfortunately I do not see
unifying theme in any of t750[012].  They test random things and there
seem to be overlaps.

Perhaps somebody wants to consolidate these three into one?

Re: [PATCH/RFC] t800?-blame.sh: retitle uniquely

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:50:14

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:51:58AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
  t7500-commit.sh
  t7501-commit.sh
  t7502-commit.sh
  t7509-commit.sh
t7509 seems to be about the authorship, so it is easy to rename it to
t7509-commit-authorship or something, but unfortunately I do not see
unifying theme in any of t750[012].  They test random things and there
seem to be overlaps.
I read through them and came to the same conclusion.
Perhaps somebody wants to consolidate these three into one?
I think this falls into my "would be nice if it had been written cleaner
in the first place, but is not worth the time to clean up" category. But
if somebody else is willing to work on it, I have no objection. :)

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help