Re: [TOY PATCH] test-lib: &&-chaining tester

Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] writes:

Elijah Newren wrote:

quoted

This patch series fixes many of the missing &&s in the testsuite.

Thanks again.  Here's a little glimpse of a future without missing &&s
to play with.

Probably a silly question, but is there any reason why we use these &&
instead of a "set -e" once and for all?

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/

Am 10/6/2010 10:09, schrieb Matthieu Moy:

Probably a silly question, but is there any reason why we use these &&
instead of a "set -e" once and for all?

Because different shells implement different behavior when "set -e" is in
effect and functions, && and || chains, and traps are in the game.

-- Hannes